Labour induction with an intermediate-dose oxytocin regimen has advantages over a high-dose regimen

Abstract A total of 200 women planned for labour induction were randomised to receive high-dose oxytocin (6 mU/min with similar increments every 45 min) or intermediate-dose oxytocin (3 mU/min with similar increments every 45 min). Oxytocin solution was prepared with 30 units in 500 ml saline with which the infusion rate in ml/h is numerically equal to oxytocin in mU/min. We observed that the caesarean rate (18% vs 6%, p = 0.009), contraction abnormalities (35% vs 14%, p = 0.0005) and neonatal bilirubin levels (7.99 ± 2.70 vs 6.80 ± 2.65, p = 0.002) were higher with high-dose than with intermediate-dose. The induction–delivery interval (IDI) was similar (10 h 13 min with high-dose and 11 h 5 min with intermediate-dose; p = 0.237, NS). Nulliparous women benefited more with intermediate-dose as the caesarean rate was higher with high-dose (24.6% vs 7.9%, p = 0.011). Although the caesarean rate was higher in multiparous women with high-dose oxytocin, it was statistically not significant (5.7% vs 2.7%; p = 0.609). Oxytocin regimens for labour induction are usually high-dose (4–6 mU/min) or low-dose (1–1.5 mU/min). The former is associated with more contraction abnormalities and the latter with prolonged IDI; both result in an increased caesarean rate. In order to offset these disadvantages, an intermediate- dose regimen was selected. The increment interval of 45 min was selected in accordance with the pharmacokinetics of oxytocin. We observed a lower caesarean rate when compared with the high-dose regimen, without any increase in the IDI. Hence, we propose that the intermediate-dose oxytocin regimen should be preferred to the high-dose regimen for labour induction.