Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view

We investigated the relationship between noise equivalent count (NEC) and axial field of view (AFOV) for PET scanners with AFOVs ranging from one-half to twice those of current clinical scanners. PET scanners with longer or shorter AFOVs could fulfill different clinical needs depending on exam volumes and site economics. Using previously validated Monte Carlo simulations, we modeled true, scattered and random coincidence counting rates for a PET ring diameter of 88 cm with 2, 4, 6, and 8 rings of detector blocks (AFOV 7.8, 15.5, 23.3, and 31.0 cm). Fully 3D acquisition mode was compared to full collimation (2D) and partial collimation (2.5D) modes. Counting rates were estimated for a 200 cm long version of the 20 cm diameter NEMA count-rate phantom and for an anthropomorphic object based on a patient scan. We estimated the live-time characteristics of the scanner from measured count-rate data and applied that estimate to the simulated results to obtain NEC as a function of object activity. We found NEC increased as a quadratic function of AFOV for 3D mode, and linearly in 2D mode. Partial collimation provided the highest overall NEC on the 2-block system and fully 3D mode provided the highest NEC on the 8-block system for clinically relevant activities. On the 4-, and 6-block systems 3D mode NEC was highest up to ∼300 MBq in the anthropomorphic phantom, above which 3D NEC dropped rapidly, and 2.5D NEC was highest. Projected total scan time to achieve NEC-density that matches current clinical practice in a typical oncology exam averaged 9, 15, 24, and 61 min for the 8-, 6-, 4-, and 2-block ring systems, when using optimal collimation. Increasing the AFOV should provide a greater than proportional increase in NEC, potentially benefiting patient throughput-to-cost ratio. Conversely, by using appropriate collimation, a two-ring (7.8 cm AFOV) system could acquire whole-body scans achieving NEC-density levels comparable to current standards within long, but feasible, scan times.

[1]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Positron emission tomography , 1988, Seminars in neurology.

[2]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[3]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  The effect of camera geometry on singles flux, scatter fraction and trues and randoms sensitivity for cylindrical 3D PET-a simulation study , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[4]  Tomoyuki Hasegawa,et al.  A Monte Carlo simulation study on coarse septa for scatter correction in 3-D PET , 2001 .

[5]  R. Badawi,et al.  A simulation-based assessment of the revised NEMA NU-2 70 cm long test phantom for PET , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[6]  C. Stearns,et al.  Random coincidence estimation from single event rates on the Discovery ST PET/CT scanner , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[7]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A quantitative approach to a weight-based scanning protocol for PET oncology imaging , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[9]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Optimization of Noise Equivalent Count Rate Performance for a Partially Collimated PET Scanner by Varying the Number of Septa , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  An investigation of sensitivity limits in PET scanners , 2007 .

[11]  Estimating live-time for new PET scanner configurations , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  P E Kinahan,et al.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  A simulation study of a long axial field of view whole-body PET scanner using cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[14]  R.E. Schmitz,et al.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Parametric design study of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner using a block-detector tomograph simulation of a cylindrical phantom , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[16]  B. Bendriem,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a New LSO PET/CT Scanner With Extended Axial Field-of-View and PSF Reconstruction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  M Conti,et al.  Towards Sub-Minute PET Examination Times , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.