Entraining in trout: a behavioural and hydrodynamic analysis

SUMMARY Rheophilic fish commonly experience unsteady flows and hydrodynamic perturbations. Instead of avoiding turbulent zones though, rheophilic fish often seek out these zones for station holding. A behaviour associated with station holding in running water is called entraining. We investigated the entraining behaviour of rainbow trout swimming in the wake of a D-shaped cylinder or sideways of a semi-infinite flat plate displaying a rounded leading edge. Entraining trout moved into specific positions close to and sideways of the submerged objects, where they often maintained their position without corrective body and/or fin motions. To identify the hydrodynamic mechanism of entraining, the flow characteristics around an artificial trout placed at the position preferred by entraining trout were analysed. Numerical simulations of the 3-D unsteady flow field were performed to obtain the unsteady pressure forces. Our results suggest that entraining trout minimise their energy expenditure during station holding by tilting their body into the mean flow direction at an angle, where the resulting lift force and wake suction force cancel out the drag. Small motions of the caudal and/or pectoral fins provide an efficient way to correct the angle, such that an equilibrium is even reached in case of unsteadiness imposed by the wake of an object.

[1]  K. Fausch,et al.  Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain , 1984 .

[2]  C. Gerstner,et al.  Use of substratum ripples for flow refuging by Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[3]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Sensory integration in the hydrodynamic world of rainbow trout , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  J. Liao Neuromuscular control of trout swimming in a vortex street: implications for energy economy during the Kármán gait , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[6]  J. Liao,et al.  A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  T. Shih,et al.  A New K-epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation , 1994 .

[8]  J. Liao,et al.  The role of the lateral line and vision on body kinematics and hydrodynamic preference of rainbow trout in turbulent flow , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  W. D. HAYES Wave Riding of Dolphins , 1953, Nature.

[10]  J. Heggenes Effects of Short-Term Flow Fluctuations on Displacement of, and Habitat Use by, Brown Trout in a Small Stream , 1988 .

[11]  A. M. Sutterlin,et al.  Possible Role of the Posterior Lateral Line in Obstacle Entrainment by Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) , 1975 .

[12]  Tamotsu Igarashi Flow Resistance and Strouhal Number of a Vortex Shedder in a Circular Pipe. , 1999 .

[13]  David L. Smith,et al.  Response of juvenile rainbow trout to turbulence produced by prismatoidal shapes , 2005 .

[14]  G. Lauder,et al.  The Kármán gait: novel body kinematics of rainbow trout swimming in a vortex street , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  Webb Entrainment by river chub nocomis micropogon and smallmouth bass micropterus dolomieu on cylinders , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. By C. HIRSCH. Wiley. Vol. 1, Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization. 1988. 515 pp. £60. Vol. 2, Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows. 1990, 691 pp. £65. , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  T. Coakley,et al.  Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development , 1997 .

[18]  G. Lauder,et al.  Fish Exploiting Vortices Decrease Muscle Activity , 2003, Science.

[19]  V. C. Patel,et al.  Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation , 1988 .

[20]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[21]  Robert L. McLaughlin,et al.  Going against the flow: an examination of the propulsive movements made by young brook trout in streams , 1998 .

[22]  R. Barry Nehring,et al.  Diel Habitat Selection by Brown Trout in the Rio Grande River, Colorado, after Placement of Boulder Structures , 1994 .

[23]  D. S. Pavlov,et al.  The Effects of Flow Turbulence on the Behavior and Distribution of Fish , 2000 .

[24]  J. Heggenes,et al.  Flexible Summer Habitat Selection by Wild, Allopatric Brown Trout in Lotic Environments , 2002 .

[25]  Tamotsu Igarashi Flow Resistance and Strouhal Number of a Vortex Shedder in a Circular Pipe. , 1999 .

[26]  C. M. Rio,et al.  The flowerpiercers' hook: an experimental test of an evolutionary trade-off , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  J. Cech,et al.  Swimming performance of delta smelt: maximum performance, and behavioral and kinematic limitations on swimming at submaximal velocities. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[29]  K. Fausch,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Microhabitat Selection by Juvenile Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Coho Salmon (O. kisutch) in a British Columbia Stream , 1993 .

[30]  A. Gosman,et al.  Solution of the implicitly discretised reacting flow equations by operator-splitting , 1986 .