Climbing Strategy for a Flexible Tree Climbing Robot—Treebot

In this paper, we propose an autonomous tree climbing strategy for a novel tree climbing robot that is named Treebot. The proposed algorithm aims to guide Treebot in climbing along an optimal path by the use of minimal sensing resources. Inspired by inchworms, the algorithm reconstructs the shape of a tree simply by the use of tactile sensors. It reveals how the realization of an environment can be achieved with limited tactile information. An efficient nonholonomic motion planning strategy is also proposed to make Treebot climb on an optimal path. This is accomplished by the prediction of the future shape of the tree. The study that is presented in this paper also includes the formulation of Treebot kinematics and an analysis of the workspace of Treebot on different shapes of a tree. Numerous experiments have been conducted to evaluate the proposed autonomous climbing algorithm and to unveil the ability of Treebot.

[1]  J. Canny,et al.  Nonholonomic Motion Planning , 1992 .

[2]  Daniela Rus,et al.  The Inchworm Robot: A Multi-Functional System , 2000, Auton. Robots.

[3]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Feature-guided exploration with a robotic finger , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[4]  Ian A. Gravagne,et al.  Manipulability, force, and compliance analysis for planar continuum manipulators , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Jason Gu,et al.  Permanent magnetic system design for the wall-climbing robot , 2005, ICMA 2005.

[6]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[7]  Roque Saltaren,et al.  A climbing parallel robot , 2006 .

[8]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Kinematics for multisection continuum robots , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  Roque J. Saltarén,et al.  A climbing parallel robot: a robot to climb along tubular and metallic structures , 2006, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[10]  Xiaobing Wu,et al.  Suction Ability Analyses of a Novel Wall Climbing Robot , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[11]  Henry C Astley,et al.  Effects of perch diameter and incline on the kinematics, performance and modes of arboreal locomotion of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Gecko inspired micro-fibrillar adhesives for wall climbing robots on micro/nanoscale rough surfaces , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Smooth Vertical Surface Climbing With Directional Adhesion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  H. Kawasaki,et al.  Novel climbing method of pruning robot , 2008, 2008 SICE Annual Conference.

[15]  William R. Provancher,et al.  ROCR: Dynamic vertical wall climbing with a pendular two-link mass-shifting robot , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[17]  Roy Kornbluh,et al.  Electroadhesive robots—wall climbing robots enabled by a novel, robust, and electrically controllable adhesion technology , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Yan-Bin Jia,et al.  Surface Patch Reconstruction From “One-Dimensional” Tactile Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.