Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone

To meet the need for an objective self-test for hearing screening, a new Dutch speech-in-noise test was developed. Digit triplets were used as speech material. The test was made fully automatic, was controlled by a computer, and can be done by telephone. It measures the speech reception threshold (triplet SRTn) using an adaptive procedure, in about 3 min. Our experiments showed no significant influence of telephone type or listening environment. Measurement errors were within 1 dB, which makes the test accurate. In additional experiments with hearing-impaired subjects (76 ears of 38 listeners), the new test was compared to the existing sentence SRTn test of Plomp and Mimpen, which is considered to be the standard. The correlation between both SRTns was 0.866. As expected, correlations between the triplet SRTn test by telephone and average pure-tone thresholds are somewhat lower: 0.732 for PTA0.5, 1, 2, and 0.770 for PTA0.5, 1, 2,4. When proper SRTn values were chosen for distinguishing between normal-hearing and hearingimpaired subjects, the triplet SRTn test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.91 and a specificity of 0.93. Sumario Para satisfacer la necesidad de un test objetivo de autoevaluacio´n para identificacio´n de problemas auditivos, se desarrollo´ una nueva prueba holandesa de lenguaje en ruido. Se utilizaron cifras de tres di´gitos como material logoaudiome´trico. El test se hizo totalmente automa´tico, controlado por una computadora y realizable por tele´fono. Mide el umbral de recepcio´n del lenguaje (SRTn triplet) en 3 minutos, utilizando un procedimiento adaptativo. Nuestras pruebas no muestran una influencia significativa del tipo de tele´fono o del ambiente de la prueba. Los errores de medicio´n no variaron en ma´s de 1 dB, lo que hace que la prueba sea exacta. En experimentos adicionales con sujetos hipoacu´sicos (76 oi´dos de 36 sujetos), la nueva prueba se comparo´ con el test de SRTn con frases de Plomp y Mimpen, considerado como el esta´ndar de referencia. La correlacio´n entre los SRTnfue de 0.866. Como se esperaba, la correlacio´n entre la prueba telefo´nica de SRTncon di´gitos triples y el promedio de umbrales tonales puros es un poco ma´s baja: 0.732 para el PTA0.5, 1, 2 y 0.770 para el PTA0.5, 1, 2, 4. Cuando se escogieron los valores apropiados de SRTnpara distinguir entre sujetos normo-oyentes e hipoacu´sicos, la prueba de SRTncon di´gitos triples demostro´ una sensibilidad de 0.91 y una especificidad de 0.93.

[1]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Duquesnoy The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G F Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P. W. Strike,et al.  Assay method comparison studies , 1991 .

[6]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  DANTALE: a new Danish speech material. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[7]  Bosman Aj,et al.  Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment , 1995 .

[8]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  G Dunn,et al.  Statistical methods in laboratory medicine. , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[10]  T Houtgast,et al.  Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[12]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J M Festen,et al.  The relationships between self-reported hearing disability and measures of auditory disability. , 1996, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  F. Rudmin,et al.  Speech reception thresholds for digits. , 1987, The Journal of auditory research.

[15]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  G F Smoorenburg,et al.  Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. , 1995, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[17]  I M Noordhoek,et al.  Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S. Kramer,et al.  The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[19]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  F. Alan Andersen,et al.  The American National Standards Institute , 1984, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.