How Quantum Theory Helps Us Explain

I offer an account of how the quantum theory we have helps us explain so much. The account depends on a pragmatist interpretation of the theory: this takes a quantum state to serve as a source of sound advice to physically situated agents on the content and appropriate degree of belief about matters concerning which they are currently inevitably ignorant. The general account of how to use quantum states and probabilities to explain otherwise puzzling regularities is then illustrated by showing how we can explain single-particle interference phenomena, the stability of matter, and interference of Bose–Einstein condensates. Finally, I note some open problems and relate this account to alternative approaches to explanation that emphasize the importance of causation, of unification, and of structure. 1 Introduction 2 Two Requirements on Explanations in Physics 3 What We Can use Quantum Theory to Explain 4 The Function of Quantum States and Born Probabilities 5 How These Functions Contribute to the Explanatory Task 6 Example One: Single-Particle Interference 7 Example Two: Explanation of the Stability of Matter 8 Example Three: Bose Condensation 9 Conclusion 1 Introduction 2 Two Requirements on Explanations in Physics 3 What We Can use Quantum Theory to Explain 4 The Function of Quantum States and Born Probabilities 5 How These Functions Contribute to the Explanatory Task 6 Example One: Single-Particle Interference 7 Example Two: Explanation of the Stability of Matter 8 Example Three: Bose Condensation 9 Conclusion

[1]  Hans Halvorson,et al.  Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory , 2000, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[2]  W. Salmon Causality without Counterfactuals , 1994, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  M. Friedman Explanation and Scientific Understanding , 1974 .

[4]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[5]  H. Price Facts and the Function of Truth , 1989 .

[6]  R. Healey Quantum Decoherence in a Pragmatist View: Dispelling Feynman’s Mystery , 2012 .

[7]  William R. Wharton,et al.  Causation with Quantum Mechanics , 2005 .

[8]  M. Redhead Incompleteness, nonlocality, and realism , 1987 .

[9]  A. Major,et al.  Wave and particle in molecular interference lithography. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[10]  P. Menzies,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Causation , 2009 .

[11]  N. Cartwright How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[12]  W. Ketterle,et al.  Observation of Interference Between Two Bose Condensates , 1997, Science.

[13]  M. Resnik,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation. , 1966 .

[14]  C. Wieman,et al.  Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor , 1995, Science.

[15]  M. Strevens Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation , 2008 .

[16]  J. Woodward Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation , 2003 .

[17]  Rob Clifton,et al.  Perspectives on Quantum Reality , 1996 .

[18]  Rob Clifton,et al.  Scientific Explanation in Quantum Theory , 1998 .

[19]  E. Lieb,et al.  The Stability of Matter in Quantum Mechanics , 2009 .

[20]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Essential Tension , 1977 .

[21]  I. Levi,et al.  Making It Explicit , 1994 .

[22]  R. Healey Reduction and Emergence in Bose-Einstein Condensates , 2009, 0910.2499.

[23]  David Deutsch The Beginning of Infinity , 2011 .

[24]  R. Tumulka A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Model , 2004, quant-ph/0406094.

[25]  R. Laflamme,et al.  Ruling Out Multi-Order Interference in Quantum Mechanics , 2010, Science.

[26]  Richard Healey,et al.  Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach , 2010, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[27]  N. Mermin Quantum theory: Concepts and methods , 1997 .

[28]  D. Deutsch The fabric of reality , 1997, The Art of Political Storytelling.

[29]  J. Becker,et al.  The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory , 1955 .

[30]  Laura Ruetsche,et al.  Interpreting Quantum Theories , 2011 .

[31]  Doreen Fraser The fate of 'particles' in quantum field theories with interactions , 2008 .

[32]  R. Healey How to Use Quantum Theory Locally to Explain EPR-Bell Correlations , 2013 .

[34]  C. Hempel Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[35]  D. Dürr,et al.  Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty , 1992, quant-ph/0308039.

[36]  Steven Weinberg,et al.  Dreams of a Final Theory , 1993 .

[37]  The stability of matter , 1976 .

[38]  R. Hughes,et al.  The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[39]  S. Weinberg Facing Up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries , 2001 .

[40]  D. Malament In Defense of Dogma: Why There Cannot be a Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of (Localizable) Particles , 1996 .

[41]  The Stability of Matter and Quantum Electrodynamics , 2002, math-ph/0209034.

[42]  H. Price Naturalism Without Mirrors , 2011 .