Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans

Although genomic studies suggest that natural selection in humans is ongoing, the strength of selection acting on particular characteristics in human populations has rarely been measured. Positive selection on male wealth appears to be a recurrent feature of human agrarian and pastoralist societies, and there is some evidence of it in industrial populations, too. Here we investigate the strength of selection on male wealth, first in contemporary Britain using data from the National Child Development Study and then across seven other varied human societies. The British data show positive selection on male income driven by increased childlessness among low‐income men but a negative association between personal income and reproductive success for women. Across cultures, selection gradients for male wealth are weakest in industrial countries and strongest in subsistence societies with extensive polygyny. Even the weakest selection gradients observed for male wealth in humans are as strong as or stronger than selection gradients reported from field studies of other species. Thus, selection on male wealth in contemporary humans appears to be ubiquitous and substantial in strength.

[1]  P. Dykstra,et al.  PATHWAYS INTO CHILDLESSNESS: EVIDENCE OF GENDERED LIFE COURSE DYNAMICS , 2008, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[2]  M. Fieder,et al.  The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society , 2007 .

[3]  L. Ellis Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison , 1995 .

[4]  D. Berrigan,et al.  Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Robert K. Moyzis,et al.  Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Napoleon A. Chagnon,et al.  Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective , 1979 .

[8]  M. Gurven,et al.  Hunting, social status and biological fitness , 2006, Social biology.

[9]  H. Gintis,et al.  The Inheritance of Inequality , 2002 .

[10]  E. Smith Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? , 2004, Human nature.

[11]  C. Aquadro,et al.  Mutation, selection and the future of human evolution. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Do high-status people really have fewer children? , 2006, Human nature.

[13]  Gregory Clark,et al.  Survival of the Richest: The Malthusian Mechanism in Pre-Industrial England , 2006, The Journal of Economic History.

[14]  S. Kanazawa Can Evolutionary Psychology Explain Reproductive Behavior in the Contemporary United States? , 2003 .

[15]  Daniel Nettle,et al.  Intelligence and class mobility in the British population. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[16]  L. Cronk,et al.  Wealth, Status, and Reproductive Success among the Mukogodo of Kenya , 1991 .

[17]  R. Hopcroft Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States , 2006 .

[18]  E. Plug,et al.  The Origins of Intergenerational Associations: Lessons from Swedish Adoption Data , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Men money and marriage: are high earners more prone than low earners to marry? , 1997 .

[20]  L. Mealey The relationship between social status and biological success: A case study of the Mormon religious hierarchy , 1985 .

[21]  M. Mulder On Cultural and Reproductive Success: Kipsigis Evidence , 1987 .

[22]  K. Hill,et al.  Hunting Ability and Reproductive Success Among Male Ache Foragers: Preliminary Results , 1985, Current Anthropology.

[23]  A. Kemkes-Grottenthaler POSTPONING OR REJECTING PARENTHOOD? RESULTS OF A SURVEY AMONG FEMALE ACADEMIC PROFESSIONALS , 2003, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[24]  E. Røskaft,et al.  Reproductive success in relation to resource-access and parental age in a small Norwegian farming parish during the period 1700-1900. , 1992 .

[25]  M. Mulder Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: evidence for female choice in mammals? , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  Thomas V Pollet,et al.  Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population , 2008, Biology Letters.

[27]  D. Perusse Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels , 1993 .

[28]  F. Marlowe Showoffs or Providers? The Parenting Effort of Hadza Men , 1999 .

[29]  B. Grant,et al.  Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[30]  M. Mulder The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Global landscape of recent inferred Darwinian selection for Homo sapiens , 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[32]  E. Voland Differential reproductive success within the Krummhörn population (Germany, 18th and 19th centuries) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  J. Pritchard,et al.  A Map of Recent Positive Selection in the Human Genome , 2006, PLoS biology.

[34]  J. M. Hoekstra,et al.  The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[35]  Burt,et al.  Natural selection in the wild. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  D. Vining Social versus reproductive success: The central theoretical problem of human sociobiology , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  C. Propper,et al.  The role of income in marriage and divorce transitions among young Americans , 2002 .

[38]  M. Marini Women's Educational Attainment and the Timing of Entry into Parenthood. , 1984 .