Individuation of multiple targets during visual enumeration: New insights from electrophysiology
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Y. Benjamini,et al. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .
[2] P. Jolicoeur,et al. Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: effects of masking. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[3] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Attention Mechanisms for Counting in Stabilized and in Dynamic Displays , 2011 .
[4] P. Cavanagh,et al. Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.
[5] Z. Pylyshyn,et al. Cueing and counting: Does the position of the attentional focus affect enumeration? , 1994 .
[6] Benoit Brisson,et al. Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task , 2008, Brain Research.
[7] Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al. Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[8] Christian N. L. Olivers,et al. Subitizing requires attention , 2008 .
[9] E. Vogel,et al. Neural Measures of Individual Differences in Selecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[10] Daniel C. Hyde,et al. All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[11] Z. Pylyshyn. Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.
[12] David C Burr,et al. Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[13] Z. Pylyshyn. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.
[14] N. Cowan. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[15] M. Chun,et al. Selecting and perceiving multiple visual objects , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[16] G. Alvarez,et al. How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] S. Luck,et al. Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[18] David C Burr,et al. Temporal auditory capture does not affect the time course of saccadic mislocalization of visual stimuli. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[19] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc , 2009, Cortex.
[20] N. P. Bichot,et al. Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.
[21] G. Mandler,et al. Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[22] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Temporal Brain Dynamics of Multiple Object Processing: The Flexibility of Individuation , 2011, PloS one.
[23] G. Woodman,et al. Dissociations Among Attention, Perception, and Awareness During Object-Substitution Masking , 2003, Psychological science.
[24] R. Melara,et al. Attentional selection of objects or features: Evidence from a modified search task , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.
[25] Nicolas Robitaille,et al. On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology , 2006, Psychological research.
[26] Valéria Csépe,et al. Similarities and differences in the coding of numerical and alphabetical order using acoustic stimulation as revealed by event-related potentials in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.
[27] Z. Pylyshyn,et al. What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] Melissa E. Libertus,et al. Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.
[29] Bahador Bahrami,et al. Modulating Attentional Load Affects Numerosity Estimation: Evidence against a Pre-Attentive Subitizing Mechanism , 2008, PloS one.
[30] Lana M Trick,et al. More than superstition: Differential effects of featural heterogeneity and change on subitizing and counting , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.
[31] M. Eimer. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[32] E. Vogel,et al. Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.
[33] Martin Eimer,et al. The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing. , 2008, Psychophysiology.
[34] D. Melcher,et al. Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity , 2011, Cognition.
[35] Carlo Umiltà,et al. Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.
[36] Daniel C. Hyde,et al. Spatial Attention Determines the Nature of Nonverbal Number Representation , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[37] Manuela Piazza,et al. How Humans Count: Numerosity and the Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.
[38] D. Kahneman,et al. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.
[39] Elizabeth S Spelke,et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of processing nonsymbolic number: An event‐related potential source localization study , 2012, Human brain mapping.
[40] Maro G. Machizawa,et al. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.
[41] S. Carey,et al. On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.
[42] Rochel Gelman,et al. Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[43] C. Gallistel,et al. Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .
[44] Z. Pylyshyn,et al. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.
[45] Jason T. Arita,et al. A cuing study of the N2pc component: An index of attentional deployment to objects rather than spatial locations , 2009, Brain Research.
[46] Thaddeus B. Czuba,et al. Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[47] Joseph Krummenacher,et al. Redundancy gains in pop-out visual search are determined by top-down task set: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[48] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison: Event-Related Potentials and the Additive-Factors Method , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[49] M. Posner,et al. Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[50] Susan Carey,et al. Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking , 2001, Cognition.
[51] S. Luck,et al. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.
[52] Matthew M. Doran,et al. The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: Evidence from ERPs , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[53] Thomas R. Knösche,et al. Counting in everyday life: Discrimination and enumeration , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[54] Harry Haroutioun Haladjian,et al. Evidence for a shared mechanism used in multiple-object tracking and subitizing , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.