PTCA registry of German community hospitals

Background Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is widely used, but no quality control has been systematically performed as yet. Methods A registry of all PTCA procedures has been established since October 1992 for the majority of the German community hospitals performing PTCA, representing about one third of all PTCA activity in Germany. Baseline demographic data, indication for PTCA, primary success and in-hospital clinical events were recorded. Each centre was visited at regular intervals to assure completeness and reliability of the data. Results Of 52 453 procedures performed from October 1992 to December 1994 the catheter laboratory and discharge forms were 99·7% and 98·1% complete, respectively. In 85·9% a single lesion was dilated per procedure, but 48·7% of the patients had multivessel disease. The success rate was 66·5% in complete occlusions (residual stenosis<70%) and 91·2% in non-occluded vessels (residual stenosis <50%). Abrupt vessel closure occurred in 3·4%, of which 77·5% could be recanalized by repeat intervention. In procedures not done for acute myocardial infarction, the in-hospital mortality was 0·52%, the procedure-related mortality 0·37%. In 3·02% of all patients a severe complication occurred (procedure-related death, myocardial infarction or emergency bypass surgery). Conclusion Complete recording of all PTCA procedures is feasible even on a nationwide basis. This is a pre-requisite for continuous quality control. The reporting of the procedures by itself very probably, has an impact on the quality which is, however, not measurable quantitatively.

[1]  K. McDonald,et al.  A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  S. Kimmel,et al.  The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications. , 1995, JAMA.

[3]  D. Pryor,et al.  The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  H. Luft,et al.  Coronary Angioplasty Statewide Experience in California , 1993, Circulation.

[5]  L. Leape,et al.  The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. , 1993, JAMA.

[6]  M. Goormastic,et al.  Multivessel and single-vessel coronary angioplasty: a comparative study. , 1992, American heart journal.

[7]  H. Hecht,et al.  Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Comparison of complications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty from 1977 to 1981 and from 1985 to 1986: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Douglas,et al.  In-hospital morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty. , 1985, Circulation.

[10]  S. Kelsey,et al.  In-hospital mortality rate in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.