Clinical implications of pharmacokinetics of sunitinib malate and N-desethyl-sunitinib plasma concentrations for treatment outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

In this study, we examined the association between the pharmacokinetics (PK) level of sunitinib malate (SU) and its metabolite N-desethyl-sunitinib (DSU) in terms of adverse events (AEs) and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The PK of sunitinib (SU and DSU) was examined in 26 patients (20 men and 6 women) with mRCC. The associations between SU/DSU C0 and AE occurrence, best response rate, time to treatment failure, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Occurrence of grade 1 or higher hand-foot syndrome and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.002 and 0.024, respectively) was associated with a high concentration before morning intake (C0) level of SU. Low C0 levels of DSU were significantly associated with drug discontinuation due to disease progression (p = 0.035). Patients with DSU C0 level higher than 15.0 ng/mL showed a tendency toward increased PFS (61 weeks vs 12 weeks, p = 0.004) and OS (36 months vs 8 months, p = 0.040). The C0 level of SU and SU + DSU were not associated with prognosis. The higher level of C0 of SU may predict developing AEs and DSU C0 >15.0 ng/mL may lead to better prognosis of patients treated with sunitinib. PK of sunitinib may be useful for determining adequate dosages and prevention of severe AEs. Further studies are required to establish the utility of the PK of sunitinib in patients with mRCC.

[1]  H. Guchelaar,et al.  Assessment of ethnic differences in sunitinib outcome between Caucasian and Asian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[2]  T. Habuchi,et al.  Clinical effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on drug-related genes in Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sunitinib , 2017, Anti-cancer drugs.

[3]  A. Boddy,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of the clinical benefits from therapeutic drug monitoring of sunitinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours , 2016, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[4]  R. Motzer,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Sunitinib by Dosing Schedule in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma or Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor , 2016, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[5]  H. Guchelaar,et al.  Individualized dosing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: are we there yet? , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[6]  M. Tan,et al.  Association of drug exposure with toxicity and clinical response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving an attenuated dosing regimen of sunitinib , 2015, Targeted Oncology.

[7]  A. Paci,et al.  Review of therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs part two--targeted therapies. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[8]  S. Sleijfer,et al.  Pharmacokinetically guided sunitinib dosing: a feasibility study in patients with advanced solid tumours , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  M. Tan,et al.  Role of sunitinib and SU12662 on dermatological toxicities in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: in vitro, in vivo, and outcomes investigation , 2014, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[10]  T. Miki,et al.  A phase II study of sunitinib in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: insights into the treatment, efficacy and safety. , 2010, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[11]  Dongwoo Kang,et al.  A Population Pharmacokinetic Meta-analysis of Sunitinib Malate (SU11248) and Its Primary Metabolite (SU12662) in Healthy Volunteers and Oncology Patients , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  E. Raymond,et al.  Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Juthamas Sukbuntherng,et al.  In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.