The Role of Transaction Costs for Financial Volatility: Evidence from the Paris Bourse

Minimum price variation rules (tick size rules) in the French stock market prior to 1999 provide a natural experiment on the role of transaction costs for financial price volatility. For stock prices above French francs (FF) 500, the minimal tick size for quotes increases from FF 0.1 to FF 1. This tick size increase generates a 20% higher median effective spread and therefore artificially inflates transaction costs. Using the range of the quoted mid-price as a tick size robust volatility metric, we calculate 47,213 hourly volatility measures for all CAC40 stocks in the price range from FF 400 to FF 600 and measure the volatility impact of the transaction cost increase at FF 500. We find that the median hourly range volatility is approximately 16% higher in the high cost regime. Panel regressions confirm this result at a high level of statistical significance. In the light of this evidence, higher transaction costs in general, and security transaction taxes in particular, should be considered as volatility increasing.

[1]  J. Keynes,et al.  The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. , 1936 .

[2]  H. Barger.  The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money , 1936, Nature.

[3]  J. Keynes.  The General Theory of Employment , 1937 .

[4]  F. Lutz,et al.  The case for flexible exchange rates , 1954 .

[5]  M. Friedman,et al.  Essays in Positive Economics , 1954 .

[6]  J. Tobin.  A Proposal for International Monetary Reform , 1978 .

[7]  James Tobin,et al.  On the efficiency of the financial system , 1984 .

[8]  J. Stiglitz.  Using tax policy to curb speculative short-term trading , 1989 .

[9]  L. Summers,et al.  When financial markets work too well: A cautious case for a securities transactions tax , 1989 .

[10]  J. H. Mulherin,et al.  Regulation, Trading Volume and Stock Market Volatility , 1990, Revue économique.

[11]  Merton H. Miller.  Financial Innovations and Market Volatility , 1992 .

[12]  J. Shoven,et al.  Adverse Implications of a Securities Transactions Excise Tax , 1991 .

[13]  G. Schwert,et al.  Securities Transaction Taxes: An Overview of Costs, Benefits and Unresolved Questions , 1993 .

[14]  Steven R. Umlauf.  Transaction taxes and the behavior of the Swedish stock market , 1993 .

[15]  W. Sharpe,et al.  International Value and Growth Stock Returns , 1993 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Froot,et al.  International Experiences with Securities Transaction Taxes , 1993 .

[17]  L. Harris.  Minimum Price Variations, Discrete Bid-Ask Spreads, and Quotation Sizes , 1994 .

[18]  Frank de Jong,et al.  A comparison of the cost of trading French shares on the Paris Bourse and on SEAQ International , 1995 .

[19]  Chester Spatt,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris Bourse , 1995 .

[20]  Sie Ting Lau,et al.  Reducing tick size on the Stock Exchange of Singapore , 1995 .

[21]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  Two Cases for Sand in the Wheels of International Finance , 1995 .

[22]  C. Cao,et al.  Tick Size, Spread, and Volume , 1996 .

[23]  Jeffrey M. Bacidore.  The Impact of Decimalization on Market Quality: An Empirical Investigation of the Toronto Stock Exchange , 1996 .

[24]  L. Harris.  Does a Large Minimum Price Variation Encourage Order Exposure , 1996 .

[25]  I. Kaul,et al.  The Tobin tax : coping with financial volatility , 1996 .

[26]  Charles M. Jones,et al.  Transaction Costs and Price Volatility: Evidence From Commission Deregulation , 1997 .

[27]  James Angel.  Tick Size, Share Prices, and Stock Splits , 1997 .

[28]  David Porter,et al.  Tick Size and Market Quality , 1997 .

[29]  Hendrik Bessembinder,et al.  Trading Costs and Return Volatility: Evidence from Exchange Listings , 1998 .

[30]  Hyuk Choe,et al.  Decimalization and competition among stock markets: Evidence from the Toronto Stock Exchange cross-listed securities , 1998 .

[31]  R. Whaley,et al.  Are “Teenies” Better? , 1998 .

[32]  Bruno Biais,et al.  Price Discovery and Learning during the Preopening Period in the Paris Bourse , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  M. Lipson,et al.  Execution Costs of Institutional Equity Orders , 1999 .

[34]  Kenneth A. Kavajecz,et al.  Eighths, Sixteenths and Market Depth: Changes in Tick Size and Liquidity Provision on the Nyse , 1999 .

[35]  Charles M. Jones,et al.  Sixteenths: Direct Evidence on Institutional Execution Costs , 1999 .

[36]  Michael A. Goldstein,et al.  Eighths, Sixteenths and Market Depth: Changes in Tick Size and Liquidity Provision on the Nyse , 2000 .

[37]  M. Lettau,et al.  Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk , 2000 .

[38]  Hendrik Bessembinder,et al.  Tick Size, Spreads, and Liquidity: An Analysis of Nasdaq Securities Trading near Ten Dollars , 2000 .

[39]  Michael W. Brandt,et al.  Range-Based Estimation of Stochastic Volatility Models , 2001 .

[40]  F. Diebold,et al.  The distribution of realized stock return volatility , 2001 .

[41]  M. Lipson,et al.  Sixteenths: Direct evidence on institutional trading costs , 2001 .

[42]  Ian Domowitz,et al.  Liquidity, Volatility and Equity Trading Costs Across Countries and Over Time , 2001 .

[43]  Ann C. Logue.  Automated versus Floor Trading: An Analysis of Execution Costs on the Paris and New York Exchanges , 2002 .

[44]  Charles M. Jones,et al.  A Century of Stock Market Liquidity and Trading Costs , 2002 .

[45]  Fany Declerck,et al.  Why Markets Should Not Necessarily Reduce Tick Size , 2002 .

[46]  Hendrik Bessembinder,et al.  Trade Execution Costs and Market Quality after Decimalization , 2003, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.