Impact of North American intense fires on aerosol optical properties measured over the European Arctic in July 2015

In this paper impact of intensive biomass burning (BB) in North America in July 2015, on aerosol optical and microphysical properties measured in the European Arctic is discussed. This study was made within the framework of the Impact of Absorbing Aerosols on radiating forcing in the European Arctic (iAREA) project. During the BB event aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 500 nm exceeded 1.2 in Spitsbergen and 0.7 in Andenes (Norway). Angstrom Exponent (AE) exceeded 1.4 while the absorbing Angstrom Exponent (AAE) varied between 1 and 1.25. BB aerosols were observed in humid atmosphere with a total water vapor column between 2 and 2.5 cm. In such conditions aerosols are activated and may produce clouds at different altitudes. Vertical structure of aerosol plumes over Svalbard, obtained from ceilometers and lidars, shows variability of range corrected signal between surface and middle and upper troposphere. Aerosol backscattering coefficients show values up to 10 -5m-1sr-1at 532 nm. Aerosol surface observations indicate chemical composition typical for biomass burning particles and very high single scattering properties. Scattering and absorption coefficients at 530 nm were up to 130 and 15 Mm-1, respectively. Single scattering albedo at the surface varied from 0.9 to 0.94. The averaged values over the entire atmospheric column, ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. Preliminary statistics of model and sunphotometer data as well as previous studies indicate that this event, in the Arctic region, must be considered extreme (such AOD was not observed in Svalbard since 2005) with a significant impact on energy budget.

[1]  M. Dubey,et al.  Aerosol single scattering albedo dependence on biomass combustion efficiency: Laboratory and field studies , 2014 .

[2]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database , 2000 .

[3]  J. Randerson,et al.  The changing radiative forcing of fires: global model estimates for past, present and future , 2012 .

[4]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.

[5]  L. Remer,et al.  The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean , 2013 .

[6]  Thomas Carlund,et al.  Overview of Sun photometer measurements of aerosol properties in Scandinavia and Svalbard , 2012 .

[7]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global impact of smoke aerosols from landscape fires on climate and the Hadley circulation , 2013 .

[8]  J. Woo,et al.  Estimate of radiative forcing of Asian biomass‐burning aerosols during the period of TRACE‐P , 2007 .

[9]  Yinon Rudich,et al.  Atmospheric HULIS : how humic-like are they ? A comprehensive and critical review , 2005 .

[10]  L. Hutley,et al.  Fire impacts on surface heat, moisture and carbon fluxes from a tropical savanna in northern Australia , 2003 .

[11]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations , 2012 .

[12]  J. Reid,et al.  An over-land aerosol optical depth data set for data assimilation by filtering, correction, and aggregation of MODIS Collection 5 optical depth retrievals , 2010 .

[13]  J. Wilson,et al.  A global black carbon aerosol model , 1996 .

[14]  R. Francey,et al.  Interannual growth rate variations of atmospheric CO2 and its δ13C, H2, CH4, and CO between 1992 and 1999 linked to biomass burning , 2002 .

[15]  F. Joseph Turk,et al.  An 11-year global gridded aerosol optical thickness reanalysis (v1.0) for atmospheric and climate sciences , 2016 .

[16]  F. Joos,et al.  Climate and human influences on global biomass burning over the past two millennia , 2008 .

[17]  L. Sahu,et al.  Regional biomass burning trends in India: Analysis of satellite fire data , 2015, Journal of Earth System Science.

[18]  Svetlana A. Terpugova,et al.  An update on polar aerosol optical properties using POLAR-AOD and other measurements performed during the International Polar Year , 2012 .

[19]  Marcin L. Witek,et al.  Global sea‐salt modeling: Results and validation against multicampaign shipboard measurements , 2007 .

[20]  W. Thomas,et al.  Aerosol profiling using the ceilometer network of the German Meteorological Service , 2010 .

[21]  J. Ogren,et al.  Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .

[22]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Comparative aerosol studies based on multi-wavelength Raman LIDAR at Ny-Ålesund, Spitsbergen , 2011 .

[23]  J. Randerson,et al.  Forecasting Fire Season Severity in South America Using Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies , 2011, Science.

[24]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Global Monitoring and Forecasting of Biomass-Burning Smoke: Description of and Lessons From the Fire Locating and Modeling of Burning Emissions (FLAMBE) Program , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[25]  J. Nee,et al.  Lidar ratio and depolarization ratio for cirrus clouds. , 2002, Applied optics.

[26]  S. Massie,et al.  Stratospheric impact of the Chisholm pyrocumulonimbus eruption: 2. Vertical profile perspective , 2008 .

[27]  G. Pappalardo,et al.  Ceilometer aerosol profiling versus Raman lidar in the frame of the INTERACT campaign of ACTRIS , 2014 .

[28]  P. Bhartia,et al.  Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation , 1998 .

[29]  M. P. Utrillas,et al.  Determination and analysis of in situ spectral aerosol optical properties by a multi-instrumental approach , 2014 .

[30]  Jeffrey S. Reid,et al.  Critical evaluation of cloud contamination in the MISR aerosol products using MODIS cloud mask products , 2013 .

[31]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997-2009) , 2010 .

[32]  A. Stohl Characteristics of atmospheric transport into the Arctic troposphere , 2006 .

[33]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[34]  Samuel S. P. Shen,et al.  Human amplification of drought-induced biomass burning in Indonesia since 1960 , 2009 .

[35]  J. Penner,et al.  A global three‐dimensional model study of carbonaceous aerosols , 1996 .

[36]  L. Stabile,et al.  Uncertainty Budget of the SMPS–APS System in the Measurement of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 , 2009 .

[37]  Dong Eun Lee,et al.  North Tropical Atlantic influence on western Amazon fire season variability , 2011 .

[38]  J. Pelon,et al.  Transport of anthropogenic and biomass burning aerosols from Europe to the Arctic during spring 2008 , 2013 .

[39]  A. Piazzalunga,et al.  Markers and influence of open biomass burning on atmospheric particulate size and composition during a major bonfire event , 2014 .

[40]  A. R. Ravishankara,et al.  Aerosol Absorption Measurement using Photoacoustic Spectroscopy: Sensitivity, Calibration, and Uncertainty Developments , 2006 .

[41]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  Humidification factors of aerosols from biomass burning in Brazil , 1998 .

[42]  Iwona S. Stachlewska,et al.  Study of aerosol optical properties during long-range transport of biomass burning from Canada to Central Europe in July 2013 , 2016 .

[43]  Robert Frouin,et al.  Maritime aerosol optical thickness measured by handheld sun photometers , 2004 .

[44]  A. Stohl,et al.  Arctic Air Pollution: Origins and Impacts , 2007, Science.

[45]  W. Thomas,et al.  What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET , 2014 .

[46]  A. Stohl,et al.  Arctic smoke – aerosol characteristics during a record smoke event in the European Arctic and its radiative impact , 2007 .

[47]  I. Prentice,et al.  Relationships among fire frequency, rainfall and vegetation patterns in the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia: an analysis based on NOAA‐AVHRR data , 2005 .

[48]  A. Pietruczuk,et al.  Impact of urban pollution emitted in Warsaw on aerosol properties , 2013 .

[49]  T. Tuch,et al.  Intercomparisons and Aerosol Calibrations of 12 Commercial Integrating Nephelometers of Three Manufacturers , 2006 .

[50]  M. Severi,et al.  An improved flow analysis-ion chromatography method for determination of cationic and anionic species at trace levels in Antarctic ice cores. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[51]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity , 2006, Science.

[52]  K. Eleftheriadis,et al.  Aerosol black carbon in the European Arctic: Measurements at Zeppelin station, Ny‐Ålesund, Svalbard from 1998–2007 , 2009 .

[53]  G. Leeuw,et al.  Angular Illumination and Truncation of Three Different Integrating Nephelometers: Implications for Empirical, Size-Based Corrections , 2009 .

[54]  Michael D. King,et al.  A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .

[55]  J. Lynch,et al.  Changes in fire regimes since the Last Glacial Maximum: an assessment based on a global synthesis and analysis of charcoal data , 2008 .

[56]  James D. Spinhirne,et al.  Compact Eye Safe Lidar Systems , 1995 .

[57]  M. Andreae,et al.  Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols , 2006 .

[58]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Biomass burning as a source of atmospheric gases CO, H2, N2O, NO, CH3Cl and COS , 1979, Nature.

[59]  I. Simmonds,et al.  The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification , 2010, Nature.

[60]  Nobuo Sugimoto,et al.  Ceilometer calibration for retrieval of aerosol optical properties , 2015 .

[61]  Christopher I. Roos,et al.  Fire in the Earth System , 2009, Science.

[62]  R. Draxler,et al.  NOAA’s HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System , 2015 .

[63]  C. Ritter,et al.  2014 iAREA campaign on aerosol in Spitsbergen – Part 2: Optical properties from Raman-lidar and in-situ observations at Ny-Ålesund , 2016 .

[64]  R. Stolarski,et al.  A Focus on Climate During the Past 100 Years , 2008 .

[65]  A. Stohl,et al.  Arctic smoke – record high air pollution levels in the European Arctic due to agricultural fires in Eastern Europe in spring 2006 , 2006 .

[66]  T. Eck,et al.  Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols , 1999 .

[67]  T. Hogan,et al.  The Description of the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System's Spectral Forecast Model , 1991 .

[68]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[69]  Jeffrey S. Reid,et al.  MODIS aerosol product analysis for data assimilation: Assessment of over‐ocean level 2 aerosol optical thickness retrievals , 2006 .

[70]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Global sensitivity studies of the direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic sulfate and black carbon aerosols , 1998 .

[71]  A. Belward,et al.  The IGBP-DIS global 1km land cover data set, DISCover: First results , 1997 .

[72]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Evidence that the spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon , 2004 .

[73]  Glenn S. Diskin,et al.  Source attribution and interannual variability of Arctic pollution in spring constrained by aircraft (ARCTAS, ARCPAC) and satellite (AIRS) observations of carbon monoxide , 2009 .

[74]  Robert J. Charlson,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer , 1996 .

[75]  David D. Turner,et al.  Full-Time, Eye-Safe Cloud and Aerosol Lidar Observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Sites: Instruments and Data Analysis , 2013 .

[76]  F. Mims,et al.  Design, calibration, and performance of MICROTOPS II handheld ozone monitor and Sun photometer , 2001 .

[77]  A. K. Jagodnicka,et al.  Study of vertical structure of aerosol optical properties with sun photometers and ceilometer during the MACRON campaign in 2007 , 2012, Acta Geophysica.

[78]  H. Wille,et al.  Detection of aerosol layers with ceilometers , 2010 .

[79]  Gert König-Langlo,et al.  Surface radiation climatology for Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard (78.9° N), basic observations for trend detection , 2015, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[80]  P. Massoli,et al.  Uncertainty in Light Scattering Measurements by TSI Nephelometer: Results from Laboratory Studies and Implications for Ambient Measurements , 2009 .

[81]  2014 iAREA campaign on aerosol in Spitsbergen – Part 1: Study of physical and chemical properties , 2016 .

[82]  Brian Cairns,et al.  Automated cloud screening algorithm for MFRSR data , 2004 .

[83]  T. Eck,et al.  A review of biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass burning particles , 2004 .

[84]  P. Levelt,et al.  Aerosols and surface UV products from Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations: An overview , 2007 .

[85]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[86]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  Optical properties of boreal region biomass burning aerosols in central Alaska and seasonal variation of aerosol optical depth at an Arctic coastal site , 2009 .

[87]  E. Kasischke,et al.  Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands , 2011 .

[88]  S. Page,et al.  The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997 , 2002, Nature.

[89]  J. Notholt,et al.  Continuous day and night aerosol optical depth observations in the Arctic between 1991 and 1999 , 2002 .