Testing for predator dependence in predator-prey dynamics: a non-parametric approach

The functional response is a key element in all predator-prey interactions. Although functional responses are traditionally modelled as being a function of prey density only, evidence is accumulating that predator density also has an important effect. However, much of the evidence comes from artificial experimental arenas under conditions not necessarily representative of the natural system, and neglecting the temporal dynamics of the organism (in particular the effects of prey depletion on the estimated functional response). Here we present a method that removes these limitations by reconstructing the functional response non-parametrically from predator-prey time-series data. This method is applied to data on a protozoan predator-prey interaction, and we obtain significant evidence of predator dependence in the functional response. A crucial element in this analysis is to include time-lags in the prey and predator reproduction rates, and we show that these delays improve the fit of the model significantly. Finally, we compare the non-parametrically reconstructed functional response to parametric forms, and suggest that a modified version of the Hassell V arley predator interference model provides a simple and flexible function for theoretical investigation and applied modelling.

[1]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The Fallacies of "Ratio‐Dependent" Predation , 1994 .

[2]  O. Sarnelle.  Inferring Process from Pattern: Trophic Level Abundances and Imbedded Interactions , 1994 .

[3]  Simon N. Wood,et al.  Super–sensitivity to structure in biological models , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  M. Hassell,et al.  General models for insect parasite and predator searching behaviour: interference , 1974 .

[5]  R. Arditi,et al.  Assessing top‐down and bottom‐up control in a litter‐based soil macroinvertebrate food chain , 2000 .

[6]  Christian Jost,et al.  About deterministic extinction in ratio-dependent predator-prey models , 1999 .

[7]  David Ruppert,et al.  Theory & Methods: Spatially‐adaptive Penalties for Spline Fitting , 2000 .

[8]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Automatic Smoothing Spline Projection Pursuit , 1994 .

[9]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Local polynomial modelling and its applications , 1994 .

[11]  Jianqing Fan.  Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 66 , 1996 .

[12]  B. G. Veilleux,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE PREDATORY INTERACTION BETWEEN PARAMECIUM AND DIDINIUM , 1979 .

[13]  Philip H. Crowley,et al.  Functional Responses and Interference within and between Year Classes of a Dragonfly Population , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing , 1992 .

[15]  John H. Lawton,et al.  On the Inadequacy of Simple Models of Mutual Interference for Parasitism and Predation , 1977 .

[16]  G. Wahba.  Spline models for observational data , 1990 .

[17]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system , 1998 .

[18]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Chaos in a Noisy World: New Methods and Evidence from Time-Series Analysis , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[19]  C Jost,et al.  Identifying predator-prey processes from time-series. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  Craig A. Stow,et al.  Resource vs. Ratio‐Dependent Consumer‐Resource Models: A Bayesian Perspective , 1995 .

[21]  J. Beddington,et al.  Mutual Interference Between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency , 1975 .

[22]  K. Watt,et al.  A Mathematical Model for the Effect of Densities of Attacked and Attacking Species on the Number Attacked , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[23]  Y. Kuang,et al.  Global analyses in some delayed ratio-dependent predator-prey systems , 1998 .

[24]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[25]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Global existence of periodic solutions in a class of delayed Gause-type predator-prey systems , 1997 .

[26]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Predator-Prey Theory and Management of Multispecies Fisheries , 1994 .

[27]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A MODEL FOR TROPHIC INTERACTION , 1975 .

[28]  W. Sutherland.  From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[29]  G. Salt,et al.  Predator and Prey Densities as Controls of the Rate of Capture by the Predator Didinium Nasutum , 1974 .

[30]  R. Arditi,et al.  Variation in Plankton Densities Among Lakes: A Case for Ratio-Dependent Predation Models , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Age-dependent predation is not a simple process. I. Continuous time models , 1983 .

[32]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties , 1996 .

[33]  V. S. Ivlev,et al.  Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes , 1962 .

[34]  G. Harrison,et al.  Comparing Predator‐Prey Models to Luckinbill's Experiment with Didinium and Paramecium , 1995 .

[35]  R. Arditi,et al.  From pattern to process: identifying predator–prey models from time-series data , 2001, Population Ecology.

[36]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[37]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  Credible, Parsimonious and Useful Predator‐Prey Models: A Reply to Abrams, Gleeson, and Sarnelle , 1995 .

[38]  L. Luckinbill,et al.  Coexistence in Laboratory Populations of Paramecium Aurelia and Its Predator Didinium Nasutum , 1973 .

[39]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Model for Tropic Interaction , 1975 .

[40]  Scott A. Boorman,et al.  On the Volterra and Other Nonlinear Models of Interacting Populations. N. S. Goel, S. C. Maitra, and E. W. Montroll. Academic Press, New York, 1971. viii, 146 pp., illus. $5.50. Reviews of Modern Physics Monographs , 1972 .

[41]  P. Wangersky,et al.  Time Lag in Population Models , 1957 .

[42]  R. Lenski,et al.  Effect of Prey Heterogeneity on the Response of a Model Food Chain to Resource Enrichment , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Inferring mechanism from time-series data: delay-differential equations , 1997 .

[44]  R. Arditi,et al.  Empirical Evidence of the Role of Heterogeneity in Ratio‐Dependent Consumption , 1993 .

[45]  P. Abrams.  Anomalous Predictions of Ratio-Dependent Models of Predation , 1997 .

[46]  R. Arditi,et al.  Functional responses and heterogeneities: an experimental test with cladocerans , 1991 .

[47]  William Gurney,et al.  Instability and complex dynamic behaviour in population models with long time delays , 1982 .

[48]  Pierre Auger,et al.  Macroscopic Dynamic Effects of Migrations in Patchy Predator-prey Systems , 1997 .

[49]  Predator Interference across Trophic Chains , 1995 .

[50]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[51]  G. F. Gause.  Experimental Demonstration of Volterra's Periodic Oscillations in the Numbers of Animals , 1935 .

[52]  Roger Arditi,et al.  Ratio-Dependent Predation: An Abstraction That Works , 1995 .

[53]  M. Hassell.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[54]  N. Altman.  Krige, Smooth, Both, or Neither? , 2000 .

[55]  David Ruppert,et al.  Penalized regression splines , 1999 .

[56]  William W. Murdoch,et al.  Simple Models and Variation in Plankton Densities Among Lakes , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Lev R. Ginzburg,et al.  Assuming reproduction to be a function of consumption raises doubts about some popular predator–prey models , 1998 .

[58]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[59]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[60]  S. Ellner,et al.  Fitting population dynamic models to time-series data by gradient matching , 2002 .

[61]  James T. Tanner,et al.  THE STABILITY AND THE INTRINSIC GROWTH RATES OF PREY AND PREDATOR POPULATIONS , 1975 .

[62]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[63]  L. Ginzburg,et al.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[64]  S. Levin.  Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[65]  R. Arditi,et al.  Emergence of donor control in patchy predator—prey systems , 1998 .

[66]  D. L. Solomon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Biomathematics: Mathematical Models in Biological Discovery , 1977 .

[67]  S. P. Blythe,et al.  Nicholson's blowflies revisited , 1980, Nature.