Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): Importance of two frequency bands as a function of sound pressure level

Summary1.Four hundred and ninety-nine females ofHyla cinerea made 820 responses in two-choice playback experiments conducted at sound pressure levels (SPL's) between 48 and 85 dB. About one-third of the animals responded at 48 dB, and the percentage increased as a function of SPL.2.Females did not show a preference for a standard synthetic call with two components (0.9 + 3.0 kHz) of equal relative amplitude over a single-component (0.9 kHz) call at 48 dB SPL, but chose the bimodal stimulus at 54 dB and higher SPL's (Table 1).3.Females chose the standard call over calls in which the high-frequency peak was attenuated by 12 or 6 dB only when the playback level (overall SPL) of the two sounds was 72 dB or higher (Figs. 1 and 2).4.Females chose the standard call over one in which the low-frequency peak was attenuated by 12 dB over the entire range of playback levels (48 to 85 dB); when the low-frequency peak was attenuated by 6 dB, females preferred the standard call at low to moderate but not high SPL's (Figs. 3 and 4).5.The behavioral results are related to acoustic communication in the natural environment and to basic neurophysiological data from the auditory system ofH. cinerea.

[1]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Morphology and Physiology of the Auditory System , 1976 .

[3]  J. E. Piercy,et al.  Outdoor sound propagation over ground of finite impedance , 1976 .

[4]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Behavioral Isolating Mechanisms of the Treefrogs Hyla cinerea and H. gratiosa , 1975 .

[5]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  The Vocalizations of Some Hybrid Treefrogs: Acoustic and Behavioral Analyses , 1974 .

[6]  H. Gerhardt MATING CALL RECOGNITION IN THE GREEN TREEFROG {HYLA CINEREA): THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOME FINE-TEMPORAL PROPERTIES , 1978 .

[7]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Temperature effects on frequency preferences and mating call frequencies in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea (Anura: Hylidae) , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[8]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Three populations of primary auditory fibers in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana): Their peripheral origins and frequency sensitivities , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[10]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) to synthetic mating calls , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Significance of two frequency bands in long distance vocal communication in the green treefrog , 1976, Nature.