Inter-organizational Public e-Service Development: Emerging Lessons from an Inside-Out Perspective

E-service development has grown to become a daily practice in most public organizations as a means for realizing digital agendas and e-government initiatives on different levels local, regional, national and transnational governmental levels. Public e-service development is often an inter-organizational IO effort with multiple actors and organizations involved in the multi-faceted dimensions of design, development and delivery decisions. Still, there is a lack of research focusing on IO public e-service development practices in particular. In order to address this lack we elaborate on reported challenges and their implications for IO public e-service development in practice. By returning to two empirical cases of IO public e-service development, the IO dimension is evolved. Our purpose is to highlight challenges in IO public e-service development with implications for research and practice. Findings are presented as eight emerging lessons learned from an inside-out perspective related to phases in IO public e-service development processes.

[1]  Ida Lindgren,et al.  Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  An Update on Business-IT Alignment: "A Line" Has Been Drawn , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[3]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Determining the type of e-government use , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  1 New models of collaboration for delivering government services : A dynamic model drawn from multi-national research , 2004 .

[5]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Recent advances in e-service in the public sector: state-of-the-art and future trends , 2011, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[6]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Benchmarking eGovernment: Improving the National and International Measurement, Evaluation and Comparison of eGovernment , 2008 .

[7]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2007 .

[8]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Implementing And Managing Egovernment: An International Text , 2005 .

[9]  Jeremy Millard,et al.  Are You Being Served?: Transforming E-Government through Service Personalisation , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[10]  Frank Schlosser,et al.  Mastering the Social IT/Business Alignment Challenge , 2012, AMCIS.

[11]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[12]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Evaluating Information Systems: Public and Private Sector , 2008 .

[13]  Bhaskar Chakrabarti,et al.  Making e-government work: Adopting the network approach , 2014, Government Information Quarterly.

[14]  Marie-Therese Christiansson,et al.  Using Goal Modelling to Evaluate Goals for eService Development in Government , 2011 .

[15]  Lung-Teng Hu,et al.  To Cross or not to Cross the Boundaries? A Reflection on Electronic Public Service Integration , 2012 .

[16]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Managing e-service development : comparing two e-government case studies , 2009 .

[17]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Six key lessons for e-government projects , 2009 .

[18]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  James R. Zetka,et al.  Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. , 1985 .

[20]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  An inter-organisational perspective on challenges in one-stop government , 2008 .

[21]  J. J. Gibson The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[22]  Fotis Kitsios,et al.  New service development in e‐government: identifying critical success factors , 2010 .

[23]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit - Findings from a stakeholder centered analysis , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Hung-Tai Tsou,et al.  Collaboration competency and partner match for e‐service product innovation through knowledge integration mechanisms , 2012 .

[26]  S. Seljan Digital Agenda for Europe: A Europe 2020 Initiative , 2014 .

[27]  Jeremy Millard Reorganisation of Government Back-Offices for Better Electronic Public Services , 2004, EGOV.

[28]  Christian Ø. Madsen,et al.  The Development in Leading e-Government Articles 2001-2010: Definitions, Perspectives, Scope, Research Philosophies, Methods and Recommendations: An Update of Heeks and Bailur , 2014, EGOV.

[29]  James R Cook Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[30]  A. Sharif Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy , 2008 .

[31]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Business & Management , 2008 .

[32]  Marie-Therese Christiansson,et al.  Testing Communicability in Public e-Services : Process and Outcomes , 2014 .

[33]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[34]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[35]  G. Morgan,et al.  Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. , 1984 .

[36]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Challenges in developing public-private business models , 2012 .

[37]  Ida Lindgren Public e-Service Stakeholders : A study on who matters for public e-service development and implementation , 2013 .

[38]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Analysing challenges, barriers and CSF of egov adoption , 2013 .

[40]  maos Strategi för myndigheternas arbete med e-förvaltning , 2010 .

[41]  K. Paskaleva-Shapira,et al.  Enhancing digital access to local cultural heritage through e-governance: innovations in theory and practice from Genoa, Italy , 2008 .

[42]  Sevgi Ozkan,et al.  E‐government transformation success: An assessment methodology and the preliminary results , 2013 .

[43]  Marie-Therese Christiansson Improving citizens’ ability to find, understand and use e-services : Communicating the social interaction dimension , 2013 .