Knowledge management in the life cycle of products

Knowledge management (KM) is a strategic issue and has as its mission to support management's effort in developing a more competitive company, applying the resource based view. Furthermore, KM is an organizational issue as it is aiding in the effort to provide a leaner and more effective organization. Finally, KM is about productivity and the application of computers and computational intelligence in the production of goods and services. Concerned with the company's drive for improvement, innovation and the creation of new knowledge, a holistic KM approach combines these three domains. Poorly managed knowledge costs the companies around the world billions of dollars. Knowledge can be developed, disseminated, shared, learned, stored and retrieved; likewise it can also be managed. Computers, and the application of computational intelligence, can improve profitability if applied together with the restructuring of companies' structures, their business and production processes, and organizational changes. We demonstrate in This work the need for a holistic approach to the KM view for companies in the manufacturing industry planning to create competitive advantage for itself.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[3]  Stephen Hill,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm , 1981 .

[4]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[5]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[6]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[7]  J. R. Goodman,et al.  Wood pole management-utility case studies , 1990 .

[8]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[9]  H. Demsetz.  The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[10]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[11]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[12]  Kesheng Wang.  Introduction to Knowledge Management: Principles and Practice , 2001 .

[13]  Stuart Smith,et al.  Organisational learning – it’s just routine , 2000 .

[14]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[15]  Edward Waltz,et al.  Knowledge Management in the Intelligence Enterprise , 2003 .

[16]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[17]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[18]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[19]  R. Nelson.  Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .