Is systems engineering a stifler or an enabler of innovation? A contribute to the ongoing debate

Fears that Systems Engineering Standards and processes could stifle creativity emerged as soon as the first of these procedures were published and enforced by the US Air force. At the same time, however, an essential component of creativity in Systems Engineering was identified, together with its ability to enable the development of innovative solutions. Those opposite perspectives have led practitioners and academicians to discuss whether Systems Engineering is rather a stifler or an enabler of innovation; this debate is still ongoing. Aiming at contributing to this open discussion, this paper critically reviews and compares prevalent existing models of creativity, innovation and Systems Engineering processes. The analysis shows a high degree of affinity between those disciplines and supports the initial central thesis of the authors: the Systems Engineering principles, if properly applied, can effectively support successful innovation.

[1]  M. Runco,et al.  The Standard Definition of Creativity , 2012 .

[2]  Charles S. Naiman,et al.  Making technology transfer happen , 1978 .

[3]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management , 2011 .

[4]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Principles of engineering design , 1982 .

[5]  Kevin Forsberg,et al.  Visualizing project management : models and frameworks for mastering complex systems , 2005 .

[6]  D. Scott Endsley.,et al.  Innovation in action , 2010 .

[7]  Bohdan W. Oppenheim.  Lean product development flow , 2004 .

[8]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration , 1988 .

[9]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Componential Theory of Creativity , 2012 .

[10]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Managing Invention and Innovation , 2007 .

[11]  R. Penny.  Principles of engineering design , 1970, Postgraduate medical journal.

[12]  Frans. Johansson,et al.  The Medici Effect: Breakthrough Insights at the Intersection of Ideas, Concepts, and Cultures , 2004 .

[13]  Vincenzo Arrichiello.  The originating concept: A foundation for System of Systems Architecting Decision Making , 2012, 2012 7th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE).

[14]  Wiley Larson,et al.  THE ART AND SCIENCE OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING , 2009 .

[15]  David H. Cropley,et al.  2.6.4 Creativity and Innovation in the Systems Engineering Process , 2000 .

[16]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously: A Quantitative Three-Criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications , 2012 .

[17]  Donald Quail.  AFSCM 375-5 SYSTEM ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES , 1966 .

[18]  E. Roberts.  What We've Learned: Managing Invention and Innovation , 1988 .

[19]  Alexander Kossiakoff,et al.  Systems Engineering Principles and Practice: Kossiakoff/Systems Engineering 2E , 2011 .

[20]  Alberto Rosso,et al.  Set-Based Concurrent Engineering Innovation Roadmap (SBCE IR): a case on Adiabatic Humidification System , 2014 .

[21]  Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski,et al.  Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education , 2010 .

[23]  Felipe Santana Lima,et al.  The Relationship between Systems Engineering and Innovation : Empirical evidences from a large, novel subsea project in Norway , 2012 .

[24]  Paul Baggio,et al.  Innovation in action , 2016 .

[25]  Edward J. Morrison.  Defense Systems Management: The 375 Series , 1967 .

[26]  J. Guilford.  Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. , 1954 .

[27]  Bohdan W. Oppenheim.  Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering , 2009 .

[28]  Kevin Forsberg,et al.  The Relationship of System Engineering to the Project Cycle , 1991 .

[29]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Stimulate Creativity by Fueling Passion , 2015 .