Static Semantics For Dynamic Discourse

L'A. s'interesse a l'idee developpee ces dernieres annees selon laquelle la semantique devrait etre dynamique, le sens d'une phrase n'etant plus pense en terme de condition de verite mais en terme de potentiel a changer les conditions de verite. Il engage une reflexion critique sur les motivations de ce changement dynamique en analysant tour a tour la pragmatique du discours, l'anaphore, la negation et la quantification universelle puis les conjonctions dynamiques. Il montre que les phenomenes qui conduisent a la theorie de la semantique dynamique sont dependants du contexte.

[1]  G. Evans.  Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (l) , 1977, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

[2]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[3]  Lenhart K. Schubert,et al.  Generically Speaking, or, Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics , 1989 .

[4]  J. Peregrin.  LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY , 1998 .

[5]  David I. Beaver,et al.  The Handbook of Logic and Language , 1997 .

[6]  William G. Lycan,et al.  Logical form in Natural Language , 1988 .

[7]  I. I. N. Kamp.  Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation , 1996 .

[8]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Bound Variables and Other Anaphors , 1978, TINLAP.

[9]  D. Davidson.  On saying that , 1968, Synthese.

[10]  Bernard Harrison,et al.  Reference and Generality , 1979 .

[11]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Combinators and Grammars , 1988 .

[12]  David Lewis,et al.  Formal semantics of Natural Language: Adverbs of quantification , 2008 .

[13]  W. Quine,et al.  The Values of Variables in Dynamic Semantics , 1995 .

[14]  Barry Taylor,et al.  Tense and continuity , 1977, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[15]  D. Hardt.  Dynamic Interpretation of Verb Phrase Ellipsis , 1999 .

[16]  I. Heim.  E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora , 1990 .

[17]  Jack Kaminsky,et al.  Reference And Generality , 1962 .

[18]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Anaphora and dynamic binding , 1992 .

[19]  Makoto Kanazawa.  Weak vs. strong readings of donkey sentences and monotonicity inference in a dynamic setting , 1994 .

[20]  W. Bonney.  Pronouns and Variables. , 1974 .

[21]  Frank Veltman,et al.  Defaults in update semantics , 1996, J. Philos. Log..

[22]  Nissim Francez,et al.  E-type pronouns, i-sums, and donkey anaphora , 1994 .

[23]  Steven E. Boër,et al.  The Myth of Semantic Presupposition , 1976 .

[24]  Craige Roberts.  Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse , 1989 .

[25]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[26]  Stephen Barker,et al.  E-Type Pronouns, DRT, Dynamic Semantics and the Quantifier/Variable-Binding Model , 1997 .

[27]  David Lewis,et al.  Scorekeeping in a language game , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[28]  Pauline Jacobson.  Towards a Variable-Free Semantics , 1999 .

[29]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Bound variables in syntax (Are there any , 1987 .

[30]  E. Doerr,et al.  General Semantics. , 1958, Science.

[31]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  A compositional approach to discourse representation theory , 1989 .

[32]  Hans Smessaert,et al.  Monotonicity properties of comparative determiners , 1996 .

[33]  Max J. Cresswell,et al.  Logics and languages , 1973 .

[34]  M. Krifka.  Parametrized sum individuals for plural anaphora , 1996 .

[35]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Local satisfaction guaranteed: A presupposition theory and its problems , 1996 .