Sources of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech.

Older people frequently show poorer recognition of rapid speech or time-compressed speech than younger listeners. The present investigation sought to determine if the age-related problem in recognition of time-compressed speech could be attributed primarily to a decline in the speed of information processing or to a decline in processing brief acoustic cues. The role of the availability of linguistic cues on recognition performance was examined also. Younger and older listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss participated in the experiments. Stimuli were sentences, linguistic phrases, and strings of random words that were unmodified in duration or were time compressed with uniform time compression or with selective time compression of consonants, vowels, or pauses. Age effects were observed for recognition of unmodified random words, but not for sentences and linguistic phrases. Analysis of difference scores (unmodified speech versus time-compressed speech) showed age effects for time-compressed sentences and phrases. The forms of time compression that were notably difficult for older listeners were uniform time compression and selective time compression of consonants. Indeed, poor performance in recognizing uniformly time-compressed speech was attributed primarily to difficulty in recognizing speech that incorporated selective time compression of consonants. Hearing loss effects were observed also for most of the listening conditions, although these effects were independent of the aging effects. In general, the findings support the notion that the problems of older listeners in recognizing time-compressed speech are associated with difficulty in processing the brief, limited acoustic cues for consonants that are inherent in rapid speech.

[1]  T Letowski,et al.  Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Effect of relative and overall amplitude on perception of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Aging and Cognitive Deficits , 1982 .

[4]  T Letowski,et al.  Comprehension of time-compressed speech: effects of age and speech complexity. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[7]  J. Pickett,et al.  The Acoustics of Speech Communication: Fundamentals, Speech Perception Theory, and Technology , 1998 .

[8]  W Melnick,et al.  American National Standard specifications for audiometers. , 1971, ASHA.

[9]  C W Turner,et al.  Formant transition duration and speech recognition in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E. Pfeiffer A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Assessment of Organic Brain Deficit in Elderly Patients † , 1975, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  James E. Birren,et al.  Behavioral slowing with age: Causes, organization, and consequences. , 1980 .

[13]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  T. Salthouse A Theory of Cognitive Aging , 1985 .

[16]  S. Gelfand,et al.  The relationship between magnitude of hearing loss and acoustic reflex threshold levels. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  T. Letowski,et al.  Understanding of time-compressed speech by older adults: effect of discard interval. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Age differences in veridical and reconstructive recall of syntactically and randomly segmented speech. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[19]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.