Parametric optimization for morphing structures design: application to morphing wings adapting to changing flight conditions

Morphing structures can allow significant improvements in performance by optimally changing shape across varying conditions. A critical barrier to the design of morphing structures is the challenge of determining how optimal shape changes as a function of the many operating conditions that affect optimality. Traditional engineering optimization techniques are able to determine an optimal shape only for one condition or an aggregation over operating conditions (i.e., optimizing average performance). Parametric optimization is an alternative approach that can solve a family of related optimization problems simultaneously. Herein the authors analyze the design of a structurally consistent camber morphing wing for light aircraft applications using parametric optimization techniques. The approach combines rigorous consideration of structural constraints via Class/Shape Transformation (CST) equations and use of a C1-continuous analytical representation of wing outer mold line geometry with the Predictive Parametric Pareto Genetic Algorithm (P3GA), an algorithm for nonlinear multi-parametric optimization. The system is tuned to maximize lift-to-drag ratio, a key metric for aircraft flight range. Kriging-based interpolation is applied to P3GA output to obtain an optimal solution map determining optimal shape variable values as a function of flight conditions (airspeed, angle of attack, and altitude). Solutions obtained from iterated use of traditional optimization techniques are utilized to benchmark the more novel and efficient parametric optimization accuracy. Results show that parametric optimization is useful for optimizing morphing structures across a range of operating conditions.

[1]  Anthony V. Fiacco,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programming using penalty methods , 1976, Math. Program..

[2]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox, Version 2.0 , 2002 .

[3]  M. Morari,et al.  On-line optimization via off-line parametric optimization tools , 2000 .

[4]  Joaquin Acevedo and,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Convex Multiparametric Nonlinear Programming Problems , 2003 .

[5]  Richard J. Malak,et al.  P3GA: An Algorithm for Technology Characterization , 2015 .

[6]  Darren J. Hartl,et al.  Structurally Consistent Class/Shape Transformation Equations for Morphing Airfoils , 2019, Journal of Aircraft.

[7]  Hiroya Seki,et al.  Optimal grade transition control for polymerization reactors , 2000 .

[8]  Darren J. Hartl,et al.  Parameterized Design Optimization of a Magnetohydrodynamic Liquid Metal Active Cooling Concept , 2016 .

[9]  R. Liem,et al.  Expected drag minimization for aerodynamic design optimization based on aircraft operational data , 2017 .

[10]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Application of shape memory alloy (SMA) spars for aircraft maneuver enhancement , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  Darren J. Hartl,et al.  Aero-structural optimization of shape memory alloy-based wing morphing via a class/shape transformation approach , 2018 .

[12]  Ce Yang,et al.  An airfoil parameterization method for the representation and optimization of wind turbine special airfoil , 2015 .

[13]  M. Selig Summary of low speed airfoil data , 1995 .

[14]  David D. Marshall,et al.  A Surface Parameterization Method for Airfoil Optimization and High Lift 2D Geometries Utilizing the CST Methodology , 2009 .

[15]  T. Gal,et al.  Linear parametric programming—A brief survey , 1984 .

[16]  Tor Arne Johansen,et al.  Continuous Selection and Unique Polyhedral Representation of Solutions to Convex Parametric Quadratic Programs , 2007 .

[17]  Brenda Kulfan Recent Extensions and Applications of the "CST" Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method , 2007 .

[18]  Peter G. Coen,et al.  Sonic Boom: Six Decades of Research , 2014 .

[19]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms and Machine Learning , 1988, Machine Learning.

[20]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Wing Design by Numerical Optimization , 1977 .

[21]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Using Support Vector Machines to Formalize the Valid Input Domain of Predictive Models in Systems Design Problems , 2010 .

[22]  Elaine T. Hale,et al.  Numerical methods for d-parametric nonlinear programming with chemical process control and optimization applications , 2005 .

[23]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Support vector domain description , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[24]  E. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Algorithms for the Solution of Multiparametric Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization Problems , 1999 .

[25]  Darren J. Hartl,et al.  Design optimization toward a shape memory alloy-based bio-inspired morphing wing , 2017 .

[26]  Darren J. Hartl,et al.  Skin-based camber morphing utilizing shape memory alloy composite actuators in a wind tunnel environment , 2018 .

[27]  Ehsanolah Assareh,et al.  Inverse design of airfoils via an intelligent hybrid optimization technique , 2017, Engineering with Computers.

[28]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Synergistic Smart Morphing AIleron: Capabilites Identification , 2016 .

[29]  C. Filippi An Algorithm for Approximate Multiparametric Linear Programming , 2004 .

[30]  A. Bemporad,et al.  Suboptimal Explicit Receding Horizon Control via Approximate Multiparametric Quadratic Programming , 2003 .

[31]  J. Vale,et al.  Optimization of a Morphing Wing Based on Coupled Aerodynamic and Structural Constraints , 2007 .

[32]  Christian B Allen,et al.  High‐fidelity aerodynamic shape optimization of modern transport wing using efficient hierarchical parameterization , 2010 .

[33]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging interpolation in simulation: a survey , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[34]  Avanidhar Subrahmanyam,et al.  Informed Speculation and Hedging in a Noncompetitive Securities Market , 1992 .

[35]  Darren J. Hartl,et al.  Performance assessment of a multi-objective parametric optimization algorithm with application to a multi-physical engineering system , 2018 .

[36]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[37]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections: Including a Summary of Airfoil Data , 1959 .

[38]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  An Algorithm for the Solution of Multiparametric Mixed Integer Linear Programming Problems , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..