Architectural Characteristics of Digital Services Enabled by Embedded Technology: A Study on Remote Diagnostics Services

In this paper, we characterize the architecture of digital services that are enabled by embedded technology. Digitalization with embedded technology in physical products has become a common phenomenon. In spite of growing instance of such digitalization, little is known about the architectural characteristics of digital services enabled by embedded technology. Based on a research on vehicular remote diagnostics services, we characterize the architecture of such digital services. Following the framework on layered modular architecture continuum, our findings provide the following architectural characteristics: i) the architecture of the digital services spans along the layered modular architecture continuum, ii) the application program of the digital services is simultaneously de-coupled and partly coupled with the embedded devices, iii) there exist layers within layer of the digital services, iv) application program layer of the digital services is a closed innovation platform.

[1]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor: Digital Controls in the Automotive Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Stefan Byttner,et al.  Consensus self-organized models for fault detection (COSMO) , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[3]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Digital Science and Knowledge Boundaries in Complex Innovation , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Jonny Holmström,et al.  Organizational dimensions of e-maintenance: a multi-contextual perspective , 2010, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[5]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop 'Digital Challenges in Innovation Research' , 2010 .

[6]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Turn to the material: Remote diagnostics systems and new forms of boundary-spanning , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[8]  Kevin Werbach,et al.  A Layered Model for Internet Policy , 2005, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[9]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[10]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Analyzing Complementarities Using Software Stacks for Software Industry Acquisitions , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Jonas Kuschel,et al.  Decentralized Remote Diagnostics: A Study of Diagnostics in the Marine Industry , 2004, BCS HCI.

[12]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[13]  Philip J. Weiser,et al.  Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age , 2003 .

[14]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  BerenteNicholas,et al.  Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor , 2012 .

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Ulrika H. Westergren,et al.  Technologies for value creation: an exploration of remote diagnostics systems in the manufacturing industry , 2008, Information Systems Journal.

[18]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems , 2005 .

[20]  Bo-Suk Yang,et al.  Development of an e-maintenance system integrating advanced techniques , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[21]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[22]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[23]  Juliana Hsuan,et al.  Service Architecture and Modularity , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[24]  Jay Lee.  Strategy and Challenges on Remote Diagnostics and Maintenance for Manufacturing Equipment , 2004 .

[25]  J. Maxwell.  Designing a qualitative study. , 1998 .

[26]  Chun-Yi Lin,et al.  Development of On-Line Diagnostics and Real Time Early Warning System for Vehicles , 2005, 2005 Sensors for Industry Conference.

[27]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[28]  Jaime Campos,et al.  Development in the application of ICT in condition monitoring and maintenance , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[29]  Laci J. Jalics,et al.  Overview of Remote Diagnosis and Maintenance for Automotive Systems , 2005 .

[30]  F. T. Campos,et al.  A reference architecture for remote diagnostics and prognostics applications , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE AUTOTESTCON.

[31]  Stefan Byttner,et al.  Networked vehicles for automated fault detection , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[32]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[33]  A. C. Márquez,et al.  The maintenance management framework : A practical view to maintenance management , 2008 .

[34]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Making Sense of Technology Trends in the Information Technology Landscape: A Design Science Approach , 2008, MIS Q..

[35]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[36]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[37]  Adolfo Crespo Márquez,et al.  The Maintenance Management Framework , 2009 .