Adaptive filtering and alternative calculations revolutionizes pulse oximetry sensitivity and specificity during motion and low perfusion

Pulse oximetry, utilizing spectrophotometric principles and normalized absorption of red and infrared light, provides vital information concerning patients' arterial oxygen saturation, pulse rate and perfusion level. Conventional pulse oximeters, incorporating conventional filters, are hampered by artifact interference from motion, electrical and ambient light and other conditions producing weak signals. Masimo introduced mathematically and physiologically based designs along with adaptive filtering and what it calls DST/spl trade/ (Discrete Saturation Transform/spl trade/) as a solution to monitoring patients even during times of severe and unpredictable noise interference. This combined with 4 other alternative calculations, revolutionized pulse oximetry performance. This new technology is called Signal Extraction Pulse Oximetry/spl reg/ or Masimo SET/spl reg/ pulse oximetry. Sensitivity and specificity of signal extraction technology, was first tested extensively in the lab on volunteers under conditions designed to simulate varying physiology, including controlled desaturations, combined with severe patient motion, and low perfusion conditions. Conventional pulse oximeters demonstrated very low sensitivity and specificity while pulse oximeters with SET showed sensitivity and specificity of over 95% under the same conditions. Clinical testing was then performed on an extensive variety of patients in the hospital environment demonstrating similar performance, validating the significant advance resulting from the use of SET. False alarms due to motion artifact and low perfusion have been reduced from up to 90% to less than 5%.

[1]  K. Tremper,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of a Prototype Motion Artifact Resistant Pulse Oximeter in the Recovery Room , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  S J Barker,et al.  Effects of Motion on the Performance of Pulse Oximeters in Volunteers , 1996, Anesthesiology.

[3]  Steven J. Barker,et al.  The effects of motion on the performance of pulse oximeters in volunteers (revised publication). , 1997 .

[4]  Steven J. Barker,et al.  The performance of three pulse oximeters during low perfusion in volunteers , 1997 .

[5]  K. Tremper,et al.  False Alarms and Sensitivity of Conventional Pulse Oximetry Versus the Masimo SET™ Technology in the Pediatric Postanesthesia Care Unit , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  C. Poets,et al.  Pulse oximeters’ reliability in detecting hypoxemia and bradycardia: Comparison between a conventional and two new generation oximeters , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[7]  W. Hay,et al.  Reliability of Conventional and New Pulse Oximetry in Neonatal Patients , 2002, Journal of Perinatology.

[8]  Steven J. Barker,et al.  Motion-resistant" pulse oximetry: a comparison of new and old models. , 2002 .

[9]  C. Durbin,et al.  More reliable oximetry reduces the frequency of arterial blood gas analyses and hastens oxygen weaning after cardiac surgery: A prospective, randomized trial of the clinical impact of a new technology , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[10]  C. Poets,et al.  Detection of hyperoxaemia in neonates: data from three new pulse oximeters , 2002, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[11]  C. Durbin,et al.  Advantages of new technology pulse oximetry with adults in extremis. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  S. Barker,et al.  “Motion-Resistant” Pulse Oximetry: A Comparison of New and Old Models , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  Lily C Chow,et al.  Can changes in clinical practice decrease the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity in very low birth weight infants? , 2003, Pediatrics.

[14]  K. Akiyoshi,et al.  Performance evaluation of a new pulse oximeter during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  21 Left Heart Hypoplasia : A Life Saved with the Use of a New Pulse Oximeter Technology , 2022 .