Satellite mapping of conservation tillage adoption in the Little River experimental watershed, Georgia

Conservation tillage is a commonly adopted best management practice for improving soil quality and reducing erosion. However, there are currently no methods in place to monitor conservation tillage adoption at the watershed scale. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Landsat TM data as a tool to depict conservation tillage in a small Coastal Plain watershed. Satellite imagery was used to calculate four commonly used indices: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Crop Residue Cover Index, Normalized Difference Tillage Index, and the Simple Tillage Index. Ground truth data consisted of a windshield survey, assigning each site a tillage regime (conventional or conservation tillage) at 138 locations throughout the watershed and surrounding areas. A logistical regression approach was used on two subsets of the data set (n = 20 or n = 44) to determine the influence of the number of ground control points on the success of modeling the occurrence of conservation tillage. The most accurate model was re-applied to the satellite image and evaluated using an independent sample of 94 survey sites. Results indicate that the normalized difference tillage and simple tillage indices performed best, with an overall accuracy of 71% and 78% for models developed using n = 20 and n = 44 sample locations, respectively. Errors were typically in the form of commission. Results are encouraging and suggest that currently available satellite imagery can be used for rapid assessment of conservation tillage adoption using minimal a priori information.

[1]  Prasanna H. Gowda,et al.  Using Thematic Mapper Data to Identify Contrasting Soil Plains and Tillage Practices , 1997 .

[2]  Craig S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Discriminating Crop Residues from Soil by Shortwave Infrared Reflectance , 2001 .

[3]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Remote sensing the spatial distribution of crop residues , 2005 .

[4]  J. L. Steiner,et al.  Measuring crop residue cover using remote sensing techniques , 1996 .

[5]  D. Sullivan,et al.  Hydrologic impacts of land-use changes in coastal plain watersheds , 2005 .

[6]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[7]  D. Sullivan,et al.  Spectral Reflectance Properties of Winter Cover Crops in the Southeastern Coastal Plain , 2007 .

[8]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Crop residue estimation using multiband reflectance , 1997 .

[9]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Fluorescence and reflectance of crop residue and soil , 1993 .

[10]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of optical remote sensing models for crop residue cover assessment , 2004 .

[11]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[12]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Potential for Discriminating Crop Residues from Soil by Reflectance and Fluorescence , 1995 .

[13]  Clint C. Truman,et al.  Evaluating Techniques for Determining Tillage Regime in the Southeastern Coastal Plain and Piedmont , 2006 .

[14]  E. R. Stoner,et al.  REFLECTANCE PROPERTIES OF SOILS , 1986 .

[15]  Examining the targeting of conservation tillage practices to steep vs. flat landscapes in the Minnesota River Basin , 2003 .

[16]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Plant Litter and Soil Reflectance , 2000 .

[17]  J. K. Aase,et al.  Reflectances from four wheat residue cover densities as influenced by three soil backgrounds , 1991 .

[18]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).