Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of the collaborative tagging phenomenon and explore some of the reasons for its emergence.Design/methodology/approach – The paper reviews the related literature and discusses some of the problems associated with, and the potential of, collaborative tagging approaches for knowledge organisation and general resource discovery. A definition of controlled vocabularies is proposed and used to assess the efficacy of collaborative tagging. An exposition of the collaborative tagging model is provided and a review of the major contributions to the tagging literature is presented.Findings – There are numerous difficulties with collaborative tagging systems (e.g. low precision, lack of collocation, etc.) that originate from the absence of properties that characterise controlled vocabularies. However, such systems can not be dismissed. Librarians and information professionals have lessons to learn from the interactive and social aspects exemplified by colla...

[1]  Brian Vickery,et al.  Techniques of information retrieval , 1970 .

[2]  James D. Anderson,et al.  The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval - Part I: Research, and the nature of human indexing , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  Classification in context: Relativity, reality, and representation , 2004 .

[4]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Metadata Extraction and Harvesting , 2004 .

[5]  Marieke Guy,et al.  Folksonomies: Tidying Up Tags? , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[6]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  Prolegomena to Library Classification , 1967 .

[7]  Henry Black,et al.  Indexing and Abstracting , 1940, The Library Quarterly.

[8]  Lutz Kolbe,et al.  Towards a procedure model in terminology management , 2005, J. Documentation.

[9]  Saul Herner.  Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing and Evaluation, 2nd Ed. F. Wilfrid Lancaster. New York: Wiley; 1979. Price: $19.75 , 1982, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Robert Abbott,et al.  Subjectivity as a Concern for Information Science: A Popperian Perspective , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[11]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Information retrieval systems; characteristics, testing, and evaluation , 1968 .

[12]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems , 2005, ArXiv.

[13]  Brant Cruz.  Corporate taxonomies can open up the big picture , 2004 .

[14]  Alice Yanosko Chamis.  Vocabulary Control and Search Strategies in Online Searching , 1991 .

[15]  Alan Dawson.  Creating metadata that work for digital libraries and Google , 2004 .

[16]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice (3rd ed.) , 2004 .

[17]  Carolyn E. Lipscomb.  Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. , 1999 .

[18]  Adam Mathes,et al.  Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata , 2004 .

[19]  Emma McCulloch.  Multiple terminologies: an obstacle to information retrieval , 2004 .

[20]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: a survey of metadata experts' opinions , 2006, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[22]  Erik Duval,et al.  Metadata Principles and Practicalities , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[23]  F. Wilfrid Lancaster.  Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice , 1991 .

[24]  M. Foucault,et al.  The Order of Things , 2017 .

[25]  Ilya Prigogine,et al.  Order out of chaos , 1984 .

[26]  Lars Marius Garshol,et al.  Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! Making Sense of it all , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Arthur Maltby,et al.  Sayer's manual of classification for librarians , 1975 .