Folding without charges

Surface charges of proteins have in several cases been found to function as “structural gatekeepers,” which avoid unwanted interactions by negative design, for example, in the control of protein aggregation and binding. The question is then if side-chain charges, due to their desolvation penalties, play a corresponding role in protein folding by avoiding competing, misfolded traps? To find out, we removed all 32 side-chain charges from the 101-residue protein S6 from Thermus thermophilus. The results show that the charge-depleted S6 variant not only retains its native structure and cooperative folding transition, but folds also faster than the wild-type protein. In addition, charge removal unleashes pronounced aggregation on longer timescales. S6 provides thus an example where the bias toward native contacts of a naturally evolved protein sequence is independent of charges, and point at a fundamental difference in the codes for folding and intermolecular interaction: specificity in folding is governed primarily by hydrophobic packing and hydrogen bonding, whereas solubility and binding relies critically on the interplay of side-chain charges.

[1]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Factors governing the foldability of proteins , 1996, Proteins.

[3]  W. Jin,et al.  De novo design of foldable proteins with smooth folding funnel: automated negative design and experimental verification. , 2003, Structure.

[4]  G. Böhm,et al.  The stability of proteins in extreme environments. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  Stella Viktoria Schieffer.  To charge or not to charge , 2010 .

[6]  Jason T. Stevens,et al.  Structure-based design of non-natural amino-acid inhibitors of amyloid fibril formation , 2011, Nature.

[7]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Unspecific hydrophobic stabilization of folding transition states , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Removal of surface charge‐charge interactions from ubiquitin leaves the protein folded and very stable , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Sheena E. Radford,et al.  Folding versus aggregation: Polypeptide conformations on competing pathways , 2008, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[10]  Solution structures and backbone dynamics of the ribosomal protein S6 and its permutant P54‐55 , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  J. Tainer,et al.  Crystallographic characterization of recombinant human CuZn superoxide dismutase. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  S Karlin,et al.  Measures of residue density in protein structures. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Denaturants can accelerate folding rates in a class of globular proteins , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  R. Sauer,et al.  Are buried salt bridges important for protein stability and conformational specificity? , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  Sheena E. Radford,et al.  Im7 folding mechanism: misfolding on a path to the native state , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[16]  C. Dobson,et al.  Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide andprotein aggregation rates , 2003, Nature.

[17]  Ellinor Haglund,et al.  Changes of Protein Folding Pathways by Circular Permutation , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  M. Hecht,et al.  Rationally designed mutations convert de novo amyloid-like fibrils into monomeric β-sheet proteins , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Emerging ideas on the molecular basis of protein and peptide aggregation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  Igor N. Berezovsky,et al.  Entropic Stabilization of Proteins and Its Proteomic Consequences , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  A. R. Fresht.  Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding , 1999 .

[22]  M. Oliveberg,et al.  The HD-exchange motions of ribosomal protein S6 are insensitive to reversal of the protein-folding pathway , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  T. Grundström,et al.  The role of protein surface charges in ion binding , 1988, Nature.

[24]  J. Scullion,et al.  To charge or not to charge? , 2009, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[25]  M. Proctor,et al.  Structural changes in the transition state of protein folding: alternative interpretations of curved chevron plots. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[26]  G Schreiber,et al.  Stability and function: two constraints in the evolution of barstar and other proteins. , 1994, Structure.

[27]  Alternative Explanations for "Multistate" Kinetics in Protein Folding: Transient Aggregation and Changing Transition-State Ensembles , 1998 .

[28]  M. Oliveberg,et al.  Malleability of protein folding pathways: a simple reason for complex behaviour. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[29]  C. Tanford.  Protein denaturation. , 1968, Advances in protein chemistry.

[30]  D. Otzen,et al.  Designed protein tetramer zipped together with a hydrophobic Alzheimer homology: a structural clue to amyloid assembly. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Karplus,et al.  How does a protein fold? , 1994, Nature.

[32]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[33]  J. Richardson,et al.  Natural β-sheet proteins use negative design to avoid edge-to-edge aggregation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Kinetics and mechanism of deoxyhemoglobin S gelation: a new approach to understanding sickle cell disease. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  P. Andersen,et al.  Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-associated Copper/Zinc Superoxide Dismutase Mutations Preferentially Reduce the Repulsive Charge of the Proteins* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  J. Danielsson,et al.  Cutting Off Functional Loops from Homodimeric Enzyme Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1) Leaves Monomeric β-Barrels* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  George M Whitesides,et al.  Why are proteins charged? Networks of charge-charge interactions in proteins measured by charge ladders and capillary electrophoresis. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[38]  A. Liljas,et al.  Crystal structure of the ribosomal protein S6 from Thermus thermophilus. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[39]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  G. Gröbner,et al.  Tunable Membrane Binding of the Intrinsically Disordered Dehydrin Lti30, a Cold-Induced Plant Stress Protein[W] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[41]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[42]  A. Fersht,et al.  Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  K. Saraboji,et al.  Folding catalysis by transient coordination of Zn2+ to the Cu ligands of the ALS-associated enzyme Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[44]  M Wilmanns,et al.  Solvation in protein folding analysis: combination of theoretical and experimental approaches. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Martin Gruebele,et al.  Folding at the speed limit , 2003, Nature.

[46]  New approach to the study of transient protein conformations: the formation of a semiburied salt link in the folding pathway of barnase. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[47]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Electrostatic effects on funneled landscapes and structural diversity in denatured protein ensembles , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  D C Richardson,et al.  Looking at proteins: representations, folding, packing, and design. Biophysical Society National Lecture, 1992. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Igor N. Berezovsky,et al.  Positive and Negative Design in Stability and Thermal Adaptation of Natural Proteins , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Sequence determinants of a conformational switch in a protein structure. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Identification of the minimal protein-folding nucleus through loop-entropy perturbations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The experimental survey of protein-folding energy landscapes , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[53]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Origins of barriers and barrierless folding in BBL , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  The protein folding 'speed limit'. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[55]  J. Doye,et al.  Inhibition of protein crystallization by evolutionary negative design , 2004, Physical biology.

[56]  D. Otzen,et al.  Salt-induced detour through compact regions of the protein folding landscape. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.