Topology optimization of couple-stress material structures

Conventional topology optimization is concerned with the structures modeled by classical theory of mechanics. Since it does not consider the effects of the microstructures of materials, the classical theory can not reveal the size effect due to material’s heterogeneity. Couple-stress theory, which takes account of the microscopic properties of the material, is capable of describing the size effect in deformations. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the formulation for topology optimization of couple-stress material structures. The artificial material density of each element is chosen as design variable. Based on the basic idea of SIMP (Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization) method, the effective material stiffness matrix of couple-stress material is related to the artificial density by power law with penalty. The structural analysis is implemented by finite element method for couple-stress materials, and a 4-noded quadrilateral couple-stress element is formulated in which C1 continuity requirement is relaxed. Some typical problems are solved and the optimal results based on the couple-stress theory are compared with the conventional ones. It is found that the optimal topologies of couple-stress continuum show remarkable size effect.

[1]  A. Eringen,et al.  LINEAR THEORY OF MICROPOLAR ELASTICITY , 1965 .

[2]  D. P. Adhikary,et al.  An Orthotropic Cosserat Elasto-Plastic Model for Layered Rocks , 2002 .

[3]  R. D. Wood.  Finite element analysis of plane couple-stress problems using first order stress functions , 1988 .

[4]  Zheng Chang-liang.  Analysis of Elastic Cosserat Medium Using Discrete Cosserat Finite Elements , 2004 .

[5]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[6]  Hierarchical cellular designs for load-bearing biocomposite beams and plates , 2005 .

[7]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[8]  M. Bendsøe.  Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[9]  I. Jasiuk,et al.  A micromechanically based couple-stress model of an elastic orthotropic two-phase composite , 2002 .

[10]  M. Ashby,et al.  Strain gradient plasticity: Theory and experiment , 1994 .

[11]  Chen Wanji,et al.  Finite element formulations of strain gradient theory for microstructures and the C0–1 patch test , 2004 .

[12]  I. Jasiuk,et al.  Planar Cosserat Elasticity of Materials With Holes and Intrusions , 1995 .

[13]  Georges Cailletaud,et al.  Cosserat modelling of size effects in the mechanical behaviour of polycrystals and multi-phase materials , 2000 .

[14]  Raymond D. Mindlin,et al.  Influence of couple-stresses on stress concentrations , 1963 .

[15]  D. Veber,et al.  Optimal topologies for micropolar solids , 2006 .

[16]  Weihong Zhang,et al.  Size effects of basic cell in static analysis of sandwich beams , 2008 .

[17]  W. Nowacki,et al.  Theory of asymmetric elasticity , 1986 .

[18]  Weihong Zhang,et al.  Scale‐related topology optimization of cellular materials and structures , 2006 .

[19]  F. Keulen,et al.  Generalized Continuum Theories: Application to Stress Analysis in Bone* , 2002 .

[20]  Davide Bigoni,et al.  Analytical Derivation of Cosserat Moduli via Homogenization of Heterogeneous Elastic Materials , 2007 .

[21]  A. Eringen.  Microcontinuum Field Theories , 2020, Advanced Continuum Theories and Finite Element Analyses.

[22]  Hui Wang,et al.  Quadrilateral isoparametric finite elements for plane elastic Cosserat bodies , 2005 .

[23]  O. Sigmund.  Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization , 2007 .

[24]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals , 2005 .

[25]  A. Eringen,et al.  Microcontinuum Field Theories II Fluent Media , 1999 .

[26]  Roderic S. Lakes,et al.  Experimental microelasticity of two porous solids , 1986 .