Processing Coordinated Structures: Incrementality and Connectedness

We recorded participants' eye movements while they read sentences containing verb-phrase coordination. Results showed evidence of immediate processing disruption when a reflexive pronoun embedded in the conjoined verb phrase mismatched the sentence subject. We argue that this result is incompatible with models of human parsing that employ only bottom-up parsing procedures, even when flexible constituency is employed. Models need to incorporate a mechanism similar to the adjoining operation in Tree-Adjoining Grammar, in which one structure is inserted into another.

[1]  W. Tabor,et al.  Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  David Andrew Schneider,et al.  Parsing and incrementality , 1999 .

[3]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[4]  WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al.  Linguistic Structure and Speech Shadowing at Very Short Latencies , 1973, Nature.

[5]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Order and structure , 1996 .

[6]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Tree Adjunct Grammars , 1975, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[7]  Mark Steedman,et al.  A Lazy way to Chart-Parse with Categorial Grammars , 1987, ACL.

[8]  Vincenzo Lombardo,et al.  Incrementality and Lexicalism: A Treebank Study , 2002 .

[9]  M. Crocker Computational Psycholinguistics: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Study of Language , 1995 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[11]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Coordination in Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalization and Implementation , 1996, COLING.

[12]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[13]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[14]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[15]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[16]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[17]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[18]  Vincenzo Lombardo,et al.  Towards a Dynamic Version of TAG , 2002, TAG+.

[19]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[20]  K Cain,et al.  The Use of Stereotypical Gender Information in Constructing a Mental Model: Evidence from English and Spanish , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[22]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish , 1988, Cognition.

[23]  Nathan Salmon,et al.  Reflexivity , 1986, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[24]  A. Munn,et al.  First Conjunct Agreement: Against a Clausal Analysis , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[25]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing: Formal, Computational, and Experimental Issues , 2002, Computational Linguistics.

[26]  Michael Niv A Psycholinguistically Motivated Parser for CCG , 1994, ACL.

[27]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation , 1994 .

[28]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies , 1991 .

[29]  David Milward,et al.  Dynamic dependency grammar , 1994 .

[30]  Bradley L. Pritchett Head position and parsing ambiguity , 1991 .

[31]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  L Frazier,et al.  Processing Coordinate Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[33]  Martin Kay,et al.  Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.

[34]  David J. Weir,et al.  The convergence of mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms , 1990 .

[35]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Variations on incremental interpretation , 1993, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[36]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Incremental Pre-Head Attachment in Japanese Parsing. , 1999 .

[37]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[38]  C. Phillips Linear Order and Constituency , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[39]  Brian Roark,et al.  Probabilistic Top-Down Parsing and Language Modeling , 2001, CL.