Impact of a Better Adherence to Antihypertensive Agents on Cerebrovascular Disease for Primary Prevention

Background and Purpose— The benefits of antihypertensive (AH) drugs on the risks of major cardiovascular outcomes have been demonstrated in clinical trials. However, approximately half of hypertensive patients do not adhere well to their prescribed AH therapy in actual practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of adherence to AH agents on the incidence of cerebrovascular disease (CD) in real-world practice. Methods— A cohort of 83 267 hypertensive patients was reconstructed from the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec databases. Subjects included were between 45 and 85 years old, initially free of cardiovascular disease, and newly treated for hypertension with AH agents between 1999 and 2004. A nested case–control design was conducted to study CD occurrence. Every case was matched for age and duration of follow-up with up to 15 randomly selected control subjects. The adherence to AH drugs was measured by calculating the medication possession ratio. Conditional logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between adherence to AH agents and CD adjusting for various potential confounders. Results— At cohort entry, the mean patient age was 65 years, 37.3% were male, 8.6% had diabetes, and 19.5% had dyslipidemia. High adherence (≥80%) to AH drugs significantly decreased the risk of CD by 22% (rate ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.87) compared with lower adherence. Male gender, occurrence of cardiovascular disease during follow-up, and dyslipidemia were risk factors for CD. Conclusion— High adherence to AH therapy is associated with a reduced risk of CD outside the context of clinical trials in primary prevention.

[1]  D. Sackett,et al.  RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL OF STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING MEDICATION COMPLIANCE IN PRIMARY HYPERTENSION , 1975, The Lancet.

[2]  B. Nightengale,et al.  Relationship of Blood Pressure Control to Adherence With Antihypertensive Monotherapy in 13 Managed Care Organizations , 2006, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[3]  W. Longstreth,et al.  Validating Administrative Data in Stroke Research , 2002, Stroke.

[4]  B. Hedblad,et al.  Sex-specific cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a cohort treated for hypertension , 2006, Journal of hypertension.

[5]  S Greenland,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis, Monte Carlo Risk Analysis, and Bayesian Uncertainty Assessment , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  A. Lippman Adherence to medication. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Etminan Pharmacoepidemiology II: The Nested Case‐Control Study—A Novel Approach in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research , 2004, Pharmacotherapy.

[8]  B. Stricker,et al.  Confounding by indication: an example of variation in the use of epidemiologic terminology. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  R. Verbrugge,et al.  Impact of Medication Adherence on Hospitalization Risk and Healthcare Cost , 2005, Medical care.

[10]  Marsha A Raebel,et al.  Measurement of Adherence in Pharmacy Administrative Databases: A Proposal for Standard Definitions and Preferred Measures , 2006, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[11]  E H Wagner,et al.  A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  C. Rand,et al.  Validation of patient reports, automated pharmacy records, and pill counts with electronic monitoring of adherence to antihypertensive therapy. , 1999, Medical care.

[13]  M Alan Brookhart,et al.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  M. McDermott,et al.  Impact of medication nonadherence on coronary heart disease outcomes. A critical review. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  C. McKevitt,et al.  Socioeconomic status and stroke , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. , 2003, JAMA.

[17]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  Donald Morisky,et al.  Medication adherence: a key factor in achieving blood pressure control and good clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients , 2004, Current opinion in cardiology.

[19]  R. Tamblyn,et al.  Validation of diagnostic codes within medical services claims. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, antihypertensive drug treatment and the risks of stroke and of coronary heart disease. , 1994, British medical bulletin.

[21]  Michal Abrahamowicz,et al.  Comparison of nested case-control and survival analysis methodologies for analysis of time-dependent exposure , 2005 .

[22]  F. Turnbull Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials , 2003, The Lancet.

[23]  R. Tamblyn,et al.  The use of prescription claims databases in pharmacoepidemiological research: the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the prescription claims database in Québec. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.