Comparison of virtual wheelchair driving performance of people with traumatic brain injury using an isometric and a conventional joystick.

UNLABELLED Cooper RA. Comparison of virtual wheelchair driving performance of people with traumatic brain injury using an isometric and a conventional joystick. OBJECTIVE To compare wheelchair driving performance in a driving simulator using a conventional joystick and an isometric joystick. DESIGN Randomized, cohort study. SETTING A research facility based in a hospital or in an independent living center. PARTICIPANTS Participants (N=20; 12 men, 8 women; mean age ± SD, 30.62±10.91 y) who were at least 1 year post-TBI. INTERVENTIONS Driving performance using an isometric joystick compared with a conventional movement joystick. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Average trial completion time, and trajectory-specific measures measured orthogonal to the center of driving tasks: root mean squared error, movement offset, movement error, and number of significant changes in heading. RESULTS After statistically controlling for driving speed, participants were able to complete the driving tasks faster with an isometric joystick than while using a conventional movement joystick. Compared with the conventional joystick, an isometric joystick used for driving forward demonstrated fewer driving errors. During reverse driving the conventional joystick performed better. CONCLUSIONS The customizable isometric joystick seems to be a promising interface for driving a powered wheelchair for individuals with TBI.

[1]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Development of a wheelchair virtual driving environment: trials with subjects with traumatic brain injury. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  M. Fernanda Bellolio,et al.  Understanding statistical tests in the medical literature: which test should I use? , 2008, International journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  Marti L. Riemer-Reiss,et al.  Factors Associated with Assistive Technology Discontinuance among Individuals with Disabilities , 2000 .

[4]  R S Rao,et al.  Evaluation of an isometric and a position joystick in a target acquisition task for individuals with cerebral palsy. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Powered wheelchair driving performance using force- and position-sensing joysticks , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE 24th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference (Cat. No.98CH36210).

[6]  L Fehr,et al.  Adequacy of power wheelchair control interfaces for persons with severe disabilities: a clinical survey. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Comparison of virtual and real electric powered wheelchair driving using a position sensing joystick and an isometric joystick. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Alcherio Martinoli,et al.  Behavioral Analysis of Mobile Robot Trajectories Using a Point Distribution Model , 2006, SAB.

[9]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Identifying Environmental Factors That Influence the Outcomes of People With Traumatic Brain Injury , 2004, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[10]  D X Cifu,et al.  The Lighthouse Strategy: Improving the Functional Status of Patients with Unilateral Neglect After Stroke and Brain Injury Using a Visual Imagery Intervention , 2001, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[11]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard , 1999, CHI '99.

[12]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices , 2001, CHI.

[13]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human Action Laws in Electronic Virtual Worlds: An Empirical Study of Path Steering Performance in VR , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Force sensing control for electric powered wheelchairs , 2000, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[15]  M J Scherer,et al.  Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Target acquisition in multiscale electronic worlds , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Visuo-spatial neglect: A systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[18]  M. Wald,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, 2002-2006 , 2010 .

[19]  K A Dunn,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A public health perspective. , 1999, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[20]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  Force Control Strategies While Driving Electric Powered Wheelchairs With Isometric and Movement-Sensing Joysticks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  D. Warden,et al.  Military TBI During the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars , 2006, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[22]  M. Boninger,et al.  Advancements in Power Wheelchair Joystick Technology: Effects of Isometric Joysticks and Signal Conditioning on Driving Performance , 2006, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[23]  John Hallam,et al.  From Animals to Animats 10 , 2008 .

[24]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Analysis of position and isometric joysticks for powered wheelchair driving , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Dan Ding,et al.  Virtual Reality and Computer-Enhanced Training Applied to Wheeled Mobility: An Overview of Work in Pittsburgh , 2005, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[26]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[27]  J. Langlois,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths , 2006 .