A comparison of distance geometry and molecular dynamics simulation techniques for conformational analysis of β‐cyclodextrin

Distance geometry and molecular dynamics simulation techniques were compared in their ability to search the conformational potential energy surface of β‐cyclodextrin. Structures generated by the DISGEO program were minimized using three different atomic point charge sets. Some of these structures were used as starting points for molecular dynamics simulation in vacuo at 298K. The distance geometry results showed that the global features of the conformational potential energy surface were generally independent of the point charge set. The distance geometry technique was able to find structures of lower energy than those obtained by direct minimization of the X‐ray or neutron diffraction structures. However, the molecular dynamics simulation technique was consistently able to find structures of lower energy than those generated by distance geometry. Root mean square fit of the trajectory structures to the starting structure showed that the simulation allowed the molecule to explore regions of the potential energy surface in the neighborhood of the starting structure. Both the distance geometry and molecular dynamics simulation techniques showed that β‐cyclodextrin can adopt a wide range of conformations in the gas phase and that these conformations are much less symmetrical than the crystalline structure.

[1]  W F van Gunsteren,et al.  On the occurrence of three-center hydrogen bonds in cyclodextrins in crystalline form and in aqueous solution: comparison of neutron diffraction and molecular dynamics results. , 1988, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[2]  R. Breslow,et al.  Improved acylation rates within cyclodextrin complexes from flexible capping of the cyclodextrin and from adjustment of the substrate geometry , 1980 .

[3]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  The combined use of NMR, distance geometry, and restrained molecular dynamics for the conformational study of a cyclic somatostatin analogue , 1988, Biopolymers.

[4]  K. Harata The Structure of the Cyclodextrin Complex. XIII. Crystal Structure of β-Cyclodextrin–1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane Complex Tridecahydrate , 1982 .

[5]  Olga Kennard,et al.  Systematic analysis of structural data as a research technique in organic chemistry , 1983 .

[6]  J. Bunce,et al.  A molecular mechanics analysis of molecular recognition by cyclodextrin mimics of α‐chymotrypsin , 1989 .

[7]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  Conformational differences between alpha-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution and in crystalline form. A molecular dynamics study. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  M. Karplus,et al.  Conformational sampling using high‐temperature molecular dynamics , 1990, Biopolymers.

[9]  F. Menger,et al.  Docking calculations on ferrocene complexation with cyclodextrins , 1988 .

[10]  P. Kollman,et al.  An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules , 1984 .

[11]  R. Breslow,et al.  Molecular modeling calculations on the acylation of .beta.-cyclodextrin by ferrocenylacrylate esters , 1988 .

[12]  Christian Betzel,et al.  Topography of cyclodextrin inclusion complexes, part 20. Circular and flip-flop hydrogen bonding in .beta.-cyclodextrin undecahydrate: a neutron diffraction study , 1984 .

[13]  W. Saenger,et al.  The flip-flop hydrogen bonding phenomenon , 1988, European Biophysics Journal.

[14]  Alfred D. French,et al.  Computer modeling of carbohydrate molecules , 1990 .