Unravelling River System Impairments in Stream Networks with an Integrated Risk Approach

Rivers are complex systems for which it is hard to make reliable assessments of causes and responses to impairments. We present a holistic risk-based framework for river ecosystem assessment integrating all potential intervening processes and functions. Risk approaches allow us to deal with uncertainty both in the construction of indicators for magnitude of stressors and in the inference of environmental processes and their impairment. Yet, here we go further than simply replacing uncertainty by a risk factor. We introduce a more accurate and rigorous notion of risk with a transcription of uncertainty in causal relationships in probability distributions for the magnitude of impairment and the weight of different descriptors, with an associated confidence in the diagnostic. We discuss how Bayesian belief networks and Bayesian hierarchical inference allow us to deal with this risk concept to predict impairments and potential recovery of river ecosystems. We developed a comprehensive approach for river ecosystem assessment, which offers an appealing tool to facilitate diagnosis of the likely causes of impairment and predict future conditions. The ability of the risk approaches to integrate multi-scale quantitative and qualitative descriptors in the identification of multiple stressor sources and pathways in the stream network, and their impairment of specific processes and structures is illustrated for the national-level risk analysis for hydromorphology and pesticide pollution. Not only does the risk-based framework provide a more complete picture of environmental impairments, but it also offers a comprehensive, user-friendly tool to instruct the decision process.

[1]  J. Wiens Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[2]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  Ecological risk assessment , 2006 .

[3]  Yin-Phan Tsang,et al.  Regional fish community indicators of landscape disturbance to catchments of the conterminous United States , 2013 .

[4]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  Multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems , 2010 .

[5]  H. Capra,et al.  Quantifying the effects of temperature and flow regime on the abundance of 0+ cyprinids in the upper River Rhone using Bayesian hierarchical modelling , 2010 .

[6]  H. Fock Integrating Multiple Pressures at Different Spatial and Temporal Scales: A Concept for Relative Ecological Risk Assessment in the European Marine Environment , 2011 .

[7]  B. Arheimer,et al.  Integration and Coupling of Hydrological Models with Water Quality Models : Applications in Europe , 2003 .

[8]  L. Kapustka Assessing Ecological Risks at the Landscape Scale: Opportunities and Technical Limitations , 2005 .

[9]  D. Dudgeon Prospects for sustaining freshwater biodiversity in the 21st century: linking ecosystem structure and function , 2010 .

[10]  A. Louise Heathwaite,et al.  Why is achieving good ecological outcomes in rivers so difficult , 2012 .

[11]  J. Olden,et al.  Fish response to the temporal hierarchy of the natural flow regime in the Daly River, northern Australia. , 2011, Journal of fish biology.

[12]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems , 2006 .

[13]  Erin E Peterson,et al.  Identifying the spatial scale of land use that most strongly influences overall river ecosystem health score. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  John Van Sickle,et al.  Parametric distance weighting of landscape influence on streams , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  S. Giove,et al.  Integrated Risk Assessment for WFD Ecological Status classification applied to Llobregat river basin (Spain). Part II - Evaluation process applied to five environmental Lines of Evidence. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis , 2004 .

[17]  Peter Davies,et al.  The Sustainable Rivers Audit: assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia , 2010 .

[18]  Susan B. Norton,et al.  Assessing ecological risk in watersheds: A case study of problem formulation in the Big Darby Creek watershed, Ohio, USA , 2000 .

[19]  J. David Allan,et al.  River Restoration in the Twenty‐First Century: Data and Experiential Knowledge to Inform Future Efforts , 2007 .

[20]  Barry T. Hart,et al.  Bayesian network models for environmental flow decision‐making: 1. Latrobe River Australia , 2011 .

[21]  J. A. Camargo,et al.  Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment. , 2006, Environment international.

[22]  R. Tauler,et al.  Distribution and assessment of surface water contamination by application of chemometric and deterministic models , 2009 .

[23]  P. Binning,et al.  A catchment scale evaluation of multiple stressor effects in headwater streams. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  J. David Allan,et al.  Investigating the relationships between environmental stressors and stream condition using Bayesian belief networks , 2012 .

[25]  K. Beven,et al.  Managing the impacts of nutrient enrichment on river systems: dealing with complex uncertainties in risk analyses , 2012 .

[26]  Geoffrey C. Poole,et al.  Quantifying Expected Ecological Response to Natural Resource Legislation: a Case Study of Riparian Buffers, Aquatic Habitat, and Trout Populations , 2006 .

[27]  Evan Harrison,et al.  Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: using weighted evidence from the literature , 2011, Freshwater Science.

[28]  William A. Brock,et al.  Spurious Certainty: How Ignoring Measurement Error and Environmental Heterogeneity May Contribute to Environmental Controversies , 2009 .

[29]  Ben Stewart-Koster,et al.  The use of Bayesian networks to guide investments in flow and catchment restoration for impaired river ecosystems , 2010 .

[30]  Glenn W Suter,et al.  A Framework for Fully Integrating Environmental Assessment , 2008, Environmental management.

[31]  William W. Taylor,et al.  A Hierarchical Spatial Framework and Database for the National River Fish Habitat Condition Assessment , 2011 .

[32]  B. Marcot,et al.  Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management , 2006 .

[33]  William Ocampo-Duque,et al.  Water quality analysis in rivers with non-parametric probability distributions and fuzzy inference systems: application to the Cauca River, Colombia. , 2013, Environment international.

[34]  Erin Bohensky,et al.  Evaluating Responses in Complex Adaptive Systems: Insights on Water Management from the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) , 2005 .

[35]  Michael J. Stewardson,et al.  Ecological Responses to Flow Alteration: Assessing Causal Relationships with Eco Evidence , 2011, Wetlands.

[36]  Y. Souchon,et al.  A hierarchical generalized linear model with variable selection: studying the response of a representative fish assemblage for large European rivers in a multi-pressure context , 2013, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[37]  Erin E. Peterson,et al.  A comparison of spatially explicit landscape representation methods and their relationship to stream condition , 2011 .

[38]  Marc Babut,et al.  How ecological indicators construction reveals social changes—The case of lakes and rivers in France , 2009 .

[39]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[40]  Billie L. Kerans,et al.  Land use and host community characteristics as predictors of disease risk , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[43]  Ur Maly Benefits of riparian forest for the aquatic ecosystem assessed at a large geographic scale , 2013 .

[44]  Ben Stewart-Koster,et al.  Understanding multiple ecological responses to anthropogenic disturbance: rivers and potential flow regime change. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[45]  Ann Louise Heathwaite,et al.  Multiple stressors on water availability at global to catchment scales: understanding human impact on nutrient cycles to protect water quality and water availability in the long term , 2010 .

[46]  Eric P. Smith,et al.  Bottom‐up and top‐down approaches to assess multiple stressors over large geographic areas , 2000 .

[47]  Bas Pedroli,et al.  Setting targets in strategies for river restoration , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  B. Downes Back to the future: little‐used tools and principles of scientific inference can help disentangle effects of multiple stressors on freshwater ecosystems , 2010 .