Linking multi-level governance to local common-pool resource theory using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis: Insights from twenty years of biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica

Abstract Understanding the relationship between multi-level institutional linkages and conditions influencing the likelihood of successful collective action has practical and theoretical relevance to sustainable local resource governance. This paper studies the relationship between multi-level linkages and local autonomy, a facilitating condition found to increase the likelihood of local successful collective action. A technique known as fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was applied to a longitudinal comparative data set. In the context of the decentralization of a protected area system in Costa Rica (1986–2006), it traced the emergence and endurance of autonomy among local institutions for biodiversity conservation. The technique illustrates which set of multi-level linkages combined in different ways, and at different points in time, to reach the same outcome (local autonomy). The findings show that a unique set of combinations of multi-level linkages led to the emergence of local autonomy among institutions for biodiversity conservation governance. In contrast, a more diverse set was associated with the endurance of local autonomy over time, suggesting that institutional diversity may play a more prominent role in the maintenance of institutional robustness than in processes of institutional emergence.

[1]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources , 2006 .

[2]  Oran R. Young,et al.  Building Regimes for Socioecological Systems: Institutional Diagnostics , 2008 .

[3]  Edella Schlager Rationality, Cooperation, and Common Pool Resources , 2002 .

[4]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[5]  V. Ostrom,et al.  The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry , 1961, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective , 2004 .

[7]  B. J. Harrell The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources , 1989 .

[8]  James M. Acheson,et al.  The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources , 1989 .

[9]  D. Goldstein Orphans of the State , 2005 .

[10]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The social-ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries , 2013 .

[11]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[12]  Nicolás L. Gutiérrez,et al.  Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries , 2011, Nature.

[13]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Fuzzy Sets , 2008 .

[14]  Thomas Rudel,et al.  Meta-analyses of case studies: A method for studying regional and global environmental change , 2008 .

[15]  M. Koike,et al.  An overview on the protected area system for forest conservation in Bangladesh , 2010, Journal of Forestry Research.

[16]  M. Kalacska,et al.  Need for Integrated Research for a Sustainable Future in Tropical Dry Forests , 2005 .

[17]  E. Ostrom A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. Golub The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. By Oran R. Young. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. 221p. $55.00 cloth, $21.95 paper , 2003, Perspectives on Politics.

[19]  Carl Folke,et al.  Rights to nature : ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment , 1996 .

[20]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[21]  Tim Trench FROM “ORPHANS OF THE STATE” TO THE COMUNIDAD CONSERVACIONISTA INSTITUCIONAL: THE CASE OF THE LACANDÓN COMMUNITY, CHIAPAS 1 , 2008 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Shepsle,et al.  Studying Institutions , 1989 .

[23]  Environmental governance reconsidered : challenges, choices, and opportunities , 2004 .

[24]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World , 2006 .

[25]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[26]  Tanya Heikkila,et al.  The Role of Cross-Scale Institutional Linkages in Common Pool Resource Management: Assessing , 2011 .

[27]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Will Lessons from Small-Scale Social Dilemmas Scale Up? , 2008 .

[28]  Evelyn Pinkerton,et al.  Translating Legal Rights into Management Practice: Overcoming Barriers to the Exercise of Co-Management , 1992 .

[29]  P Ekins,et al.  The Drama of the Commons - Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S. & Weber, E. (Eds.), National Academy Press, Washington DC (Review) , 2004 .

[30]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Foundations : SESs , Variability , Disturbance , Scale , and HOT , 2007 .

[31]  E. Ostrom A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[32]  Gwen Arnold,et al.  A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management , 2010 .

[33]  J. R. Commons,et al.  Legal foundations of capitalism , 1925 .

[34]  A. Agrawal 2 Common Resources and Institutional Sustainability , 2009 .

[35]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[36]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[37]  P. Steinberg Environmental Leadership in Developing Countries: Transnational Relations and Biodiversity Policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia , 2001 .

[38]  L. Persha,et al.  Nesting local forestry initiatives: revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. , 2010 .

[39]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[40]  Heike Schroeder,et al.  Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers , 2008 .

[41]  R. Wade,et al.  Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India , 1989 .

[42]  E. Ostrom COPING WITH TRAGEDIES OF THE COMMONS , 1999 .

[43]  P. J. Daugherty,et al.  What Makes Community Forest Management Successful: A Meta-Study From Community Forests Throughout the World , 2006 .

[44]  X. Basurto Bureaucratic Barriers Limit Local Participatory Governance in Protected Areas in Costa Rica , 2013 .

[45]  W. Neil Adger,et al.  The Political Economy of Cross-Scale Networks in Resource Co- Management , 2005 .

[46]  G. Hartshorn,et al.  The Green Republic: A Conservation History of Costa Rica , 1997 .

[47]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation , 2011, Science.

[48]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[49]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[50]  J. Whitbeck Green Phoenix: Restoring the Tropical Forests of Guanacaste, Costa Rica , 2004 .

[51]  X. Basurto,et al.  Institutional Arrangements for Adaptive Governance of Biodiversity Conservation: The Experience of the Area de Conservación de Guanacaste, Costa Rica , 2013 .

[52]  Tony Barnett,et al.  Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India. , 1990 .

[53]  Jane Southworth,et al.  Monitoring Parks Through Remote Sensing: Studies in Nepal and Honduras , 2004, Environmental management.

[54]  Amy R. Poteete,et al.  Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice , 2010 .

[55]  W. Allen Green Phoenix: Restoring the Tropical Forests of Guanacaste, Costa Rica , 2001 .

[56]  G. Tullock,et al.  The calculus of consent : logical foundations of constitutional democracy , 1962 .

[57]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets , 2010 .

[58]  Michael Cox,et al.  Advancing the diagnostic analysis of environmental problems , 2011 .

[59]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey , 2000, Ecological Economics.

[60]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Common property resources : ecology and community-based sustainable development , 1989 .

[61]  H. Folmer,et al.  Policy analysis for tropical marine reserves: challenges and directions , 2003 .

[62]  James A. Wilson Matching Social and Ecological Systems in Complex Ocean Fisheries , 2006 .

[63]  Jean-Philippe Platteau,et al.  Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? , 2000 .

[64]  V. Ostrom,et al.  Artisanship and Artifact , 1980 .

[65]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The Samaritan's Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid , 2005 .

[66]  U. Martin Persson,et al.  Tropical Forests: Regional Paths of Destruction and Regeneration in the Late Twentieth Century , 2007 .

[67]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The Danger of Self-Evident Truths* , 2000, PS: Political Science & Politics.