A Combination Method for Electrocardiogram Rejection from Surface Electromyogram

The electrocardiogram signal which represents the electrical activity of the heart provides interference in the recording of the electromyogram signal, when the electromyogram signal is recorded from muscles close to the heart. Therefore, due to impurities, electromyogram signals recorded from this area cannot be used. In this paper, a new method was developed using a combination of artificial neural network and wavelet transform approaches, to eliminate the electrocardiogram artifact from electromyogram signals and improve results. For this purpose, contaminated signal is initially cleaned using the neural network. With this process, a large amount of noise can be removed. However, low-frequency noise components remain in the signal that can be removed using wavelet. Finally, the result of the proposed method is compared with other methods that were used in different papers to remove electrocardiogram from electromyogram. In this paper in order to compare methods, qualitative and quantitative criteria such as signal to noise ratio, relative error, power spectrum density and coherence have been investigated for evaluation and comparison. The results of signal to noise ratio and relative error are equal to 15.6015 and 0.0139, respectively.

[1]  N. Ghaeb Simulation Study for Electrocardiography Contamination in Surface Electromyography , 2008, 2008 Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference.

[2]  Peter Holland,et al.  Removing ECG noise from surface EMG signals using adaptive filtering , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  A. Fallah,et al.  A comparison of adaptive filter and artificial neural network results in removing electrocardiogram contamination from surface EMGs , 2012, 20th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE2012).

[4]  R. Swarnalath,et al.  Maternal ECG Cancellation in Abdominal Signal Using ANFIS and Wavelets , 2010 .

[5]  Yong Hu,et al.  ICA-based ECG removal from Surface Electromyography and its effect on Low Back Pain Assessment , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[6]  B. Polus,et al.  Electrocardiogram Removal from Electromyogram of the Lumbar Muscles , 2004 .

[7]  Selva Vijila,et al.  Interference cancellation in EMG signal Using ANFIS , 2009 .

[8]  C. Kezi Selva Vijila,et al.  Cancellation of ECG in Electromyogram Using Back Propagation Network , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing.

[9]  Hualou Liang,et al.  Removal of ECG contamination from diaphragmatic EMG by nonlinear filtering , 2005 .

[10]  Sylvain Meignen,et al.  Contribution to Structural Intensity Tool : Application to the Cancellation of ECG Interference in Diaphragmatic EMG , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  A Bartolo,et al.  Analysis of diaphragm EMG signals: comparison of gating vs. subtraction for removal of ECG contamination. , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  Seth Stovack Kessler Piezoelectric-based in-situ damage detection of composite materials for structural health monitoring systems , 2002 .

[13]  D Chaffin,et al.  High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  S. Van Huffel,et al.  Wavelet-Independent Component Analysis to remove Electrocardiography Contamination in surface Electromyography , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Werner Wolf,et al.  New aspects to event-synchronous cancellation of ECG interference: an application of the method in diaphragmatic EMG signals , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Ravinder K. Mittal,et al.  Adaptive cancellation of ECG artifacts in the diaphragm electromyographic signals obtained through intraoesophageal electrodes during swallowing and inspiration , 1994 .

[17]  Yong Hu,et al.  ECG Cancellation for Surface Electromyography Measurement Using Independent Component Analysis , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[18]  Choujun Zhan,et al.  A wavelet-based adaptive filter for removing ECG interference in EMGdi signals. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  Stephen R. Alty,et al.  Denoising of diaphragmatic electromyogram signals for respiratory control and diagnostic purposes , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  A. Fallah,et al.  A comparison of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and real-time filtering in cancellation ECG artifact from surface EMGs , 2012, 20th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE2012).

[21]  D.K. Kumar,et al.  Electrocardiogram removal from electromyogram of the muscles , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  K. Assaleh Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems for Extracting Fetal Electrocardiogram , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology.

[23]  Heather L. Butler,et al.  The interpretation of abdominal wall muscle recruitment strategies change when the electrocardiogram (ECG) is removed from the electromyogram (EMG). , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[24]  C Marque,et al.  Adaptive filtering for ECG rejection from surface EMG recordings. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[25]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Elimination of ECG Artifacts from Myoelectric Prosthesis Control Signals Developed by Targeted Muscle Reinnervation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.