The Electrocardiogram During Exercise: Findings in Bipolar Chest Leads of 1,449 Middle‐Aged Men, at Moderate Work Levels

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC (ECG) recording during exercise, employed for years by work physiologists, has only recently arrived on the scene of cardiovascular investigations in clinical, epidemiological, and sports medical areas. This has come about from interest in the import of ECG events observed during activity, from the improved safety provided by monitoring performance tests, and from technical innovations which have led to more convenience and better quality in recordings. The extension of investigations in this area and certain reasons of expediency have led to use of many nonstandard testing and monitoring procedures. These include nonstandard configurations of ECG electrodes across the chest, the upright posture, FM radio transmission of the ECG, numerous other developments in instrumentation, and different modes of imposing work stress. Standardization of method in exercise electrocardiography is not yet possible or desirable, because of rapid developments in quantitative cardiography and work physiology.1 Though it is not clear whether most of the nonstandard methods now used are desirable for the long run, they are nevertheless in use, and some quantitative base for the diagnostic and prognostic information sought from these methods is of interest. This report concerns a specific application in which nonstandard electrocardiography

[1]  H BLACKBURN,et al.  THE EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; EXPERIENCE IN ANALYSIS OF "NOISY" CARDIOGRAMS WITH A SMALL COMPUTER. , 1965, American heart journal.

[2]  L. T. Sheffield,et al.  Exercise Graded by Heart Rate in Electrocardiographic Testing for Angina Pectoris , 1965, Circulation.

[3]  WHAT ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC LEADS TO TAKE AFTER EXERCISE? , 1964, American heart journal.

[4]  R A Bruce,et al.  Quantitation of QRS and ST segment responses to exercise. , 1966, American heart journal.

[5]  R. Bruce,et al.  MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA AFTER MAXIMAL EXERCISE IN HEALTHY MEN. A METHOD FOR DETECTING POTENTIAL CORONARY HEART DISEASE? , 1965, American heart journal.

[6]  H. Semler,et al.  Postural ST‐T Wave Changes in the Radioelectrocardiogram Simulating Myocardial Ischemia , 1965, Circulation.

[7]  O H SCHMITT,et al.  AVERAGING TECHNIQUES EMPLOYING SEVERAL SIMULTANEOUS PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIABLES , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  I. Åstrand,et al.  The frank lead exercise electrocardiogram. A quantitative study based on averaging technic and digital computer analysis. , 1965, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[9]  H V Pipberger,et al.  The low-frequency response of electrocardiographs, a frequent source of recording errors. , 1966, American heart journal.

[10]  B. Surawicz,et al.  Characteristics of true-positive and false-positive results of electrocardiographic Master twostep exercise tests. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. E. Mason,et al.  A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. , 1966, American heart journal.

[12]  T. Strandell ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS AT REST, DURING AND AFTER EXERCISE IN HEALTHY OLD MEN COMPARED WITH YOUNG MEN. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[13]  L. Pordy,et al.  The Two‐Step Exercise Electrocardiogram: A Double‐Blind Evaluation of Its Use in the Diagnosis of Angina Pectoris , 1962, Circulation.

[14]  T. W. Mattingly The postexercise electrocardiogram. Its value in the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary arterial disease. , 1962, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  H. Blackburn THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM IN CARDIOVASCULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY: PROBLEMS IN STANDARDIZED APPLICATION † , 1965, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.