An integrated multiple criteria preference ranking approach to the Canadian west coast port congestion conflict

Highlights? The Canadian west coast is facing increasing port congestion problems. ? An AHP based preference ranking method is incorporated into conflict resolution. ? Our analysis provides structural insights from a third-party perspective. An integrative conflict analysis approach, incorporating an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based preference ranking method into the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR), is employed to investigate the Canadian west coast port congestion dispute. The Canadian west coast has historically been an important gateway connecting North America to Asia thanks to its specific geographical and strategic location. Despite successful operations and maintenance of the port facilities to handle international trade during the past few decades, the west coast is now facing increasing congestion problems, resulting in significant delays in transporting goods from the west coast to other parts of Canada and the USA. The strategic analyses carried out in this research suggest potential resolutions in which Canada would expand port facilities at various locations, encouraging traders to continue choosing the Canadian west coast as one of their trade gateways to North America.

[1]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  TRANSPORT PLANNING WITH MULTIPLE CRITERIA: THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPLICATIONS AND PROGRESS REVIEW , 1995 .

[3]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Negotiation support using the Decision Support System GMCR , 1996 .

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback , 2001 .

[5]  H. A. Donegan,et al.  A New Approach to Ahp Decision‐Making , 1992 .

[6]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A decision support system for interactive decision making-Part I: model formulation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[8]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Past, Present, and Future , 2005 .

[9]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Negotiation support using the Decision Support System GMCR , 1996 .

[10]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Charles Leake Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1993 .

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[13]  Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki,et al.  Real world representation of a road network for route planning in GIS , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Jun Guo,et al.  Rank B2C e-commerce websites in e-alliance based on AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales within AHP , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Applying AHP to select drugs to be produced by anticipation in a chemotherapy compounding unit , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Samuel Lipsman,et al.  Fighting for Time , 1983 .

[18]  Tom Gilb,et al.  Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1994 .

[19]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A decision support system for interactive decision making - Part II: analysis and output interpretation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[21]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The integration of a multiple criteria preference ranking approach for Conflict Resolution , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[22]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  Seaport research: a structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s , 2011 .

[23]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .