On LEM/LES methodology for two-phase flows

A two-phase subgrid combustion model developed earlier has been evaluated for applicability in largeeddy simulations (LES). Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) of two-phase isotropic turbulence in the presence of passive, momentum-coupled and vaporizing droplets has been extensively studied to form a base-line database. Current DNS results agree with earlier studies and show that the presence of droplets increase the kinetic energy and dissipation at the small scales. LES for these same cases were also carried out to investigate what modifications are needed to incorporate the small-scale turbulence modifications seen in DNS of two-phase flows. LES subgrid modeling for two-phase mixing within the context of the new subgrid combustion model is also addressed. INTRODUCTION Liquid fuel is used in many of the conventional engines (e.g., gas-turbine, internal combustion and diesel engines). Environmental concerns, government regulations and commercial viability makes it imperative to increase efficiency and reduce emissions. To achieve these desired features, there is a need to develop numerical methods which can accurately capture liquid fuel atomization process and fuel-air mixing downstream of the fuel injector. Steady-state methods are not suitable for studying highly unsteady fuel atomization and fuel-air mixing processes. On the other hand, although the unsteady mixing process can be studied quite accurately using direct numerical simulation (DNS) (e.g., Poinsot, 1996), the application of DNS is limited to low to moderate Reynolds numbers (Re) due to resolution requirements and t. Currently at Oak Ridge National Labs, Oak Ridge, TN. $. Professor, Senior Membk, AIAA * Copyright

[1]  H. C. Mongia,et al.  On the modeling of turbulent evaporating sprays: Eulerian versus lagrangian approach , 1987 .

[2]  Robert McDougall Kerr,et al.  Higher-order derivative correlations and the alignment of small-scale structures in isotropic numerical turbulence , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  K. Squires,et al.  Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence , 1990 .

[4]  S. Elghobashi,et al.  Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a decaying isotropic turbulence , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  T. Poinsot Using direct numerical simulations to understand premixed turbulent combustion , 1996 .

[6]  J. Lasheras,et al.  Particle dispersion in the developing free shear layer. Part 2. Forced flow , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  V. Yang,et al.  Analysis of transcritical spray phenomena in turbulent mixing layers , 1996 .

[8]  K. Squires,et al.  Measurements of particle dispersion obtained from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Eckart Meiburg,et al.  The accumulation and dispersion of heavy particles in forced two‐dimensional mixing layers. Part 2: The effect of gravity , 1995 .

[10]  J. Shuen,et al.  A coupled multi-block solution procedure for spray combustion in complex geometries , 1993 .

[11]  P. Yeung Multi-scalar triadic interactions in differential diffusion with and without mean scalar gradients , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Jose C. F. Pereira,et al.  Computation of Particle-Laden Turbulent Gas Flows Using Two Dispersion Models , 1998 .

[13]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence , 1988 .

[14]  K. Squires,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Suresh Menon,et al.  Subgrid modeling for reacting large eddy simulations , 1996 .

[16]  S. Menon,et al.  High Reynolds number flow simulations using the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model , 1996 .

[17]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Linear-Eddy Modeling of Turbulent Transport. Part 4. Structure of Diffusion Flames , 1992 .

[18]  Eckart Meiburg,et al.  THE ACCUMULATION AND DISPERSION OF HEAVY PARTICLES IN FORCED TWO-DIMENSIONAL MIXING LAYERS. I: THE FUNDAMENTAL AND SUBHARMONIC CASES , 1994 .

[19]  S. Pannala,et al.  Subgrid modeling of unsteady two-phase turbulent flows , 1997 .

[20]  S. Pope,et al.  Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  S. Menon Large Eddy Simulations of Two-Phase Turbulent Flows" , 1998 .

[22]  Said Elghobashi,et al.  On the two‐way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. II. Particle dispersion , 1994 .

[23]  S. Menon,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Fuel Sprays , 1999 .

[24]  S. Elghobashi,et al.  On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. I: Turbulence modification , 1993 .

[25]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Linear-eddy modeling of turbulent transport. II: Application to shear layer mixing , 1989 .

[26]  H. Mongia,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of a Gas Turbine Combustor Flow , 1999 .

[27]  Farzad Mashayek,et al.  Droplet–turbulence interactions in low-Mach-number homogeneous shear two-phase flows , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  G. Faeth Evaporation and combustion of sprays , 1983 .

[29]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Linear-eddy modelling of turbulent transport. Part 6. Microstructure of diffusive scalar mixing fields , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Kyle D. Squires,et al.  Large eddy simulation of particle‐laden turbulent channel flow , 1996 .

[31]  S. Menon,et al.  Linear-eddy subgrid model for reacting large-eddy simulations - Heat release effects , 1997 .

[32]  S. Orszag,et al.  Secondary instability of a temporally growing mixing layer , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.