Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions

Abstract Much recent work in Cognitive Linguistics and neighbouring disciplines has adopted a so-called usage-based perspective in which generalizations are based on the analysis of authentic usage data provided by computerized corpora. However, the analysis of such data does not always utilize methodological findings from other disciplines to avoid analytical pitfalls and, at the same time, generate robust results. A case in point is the strategy of using corpus frequencies. In this paper, we take up a recently much debated issue from construction grammar concerning the association between verbs and argument-structure constructions, and investigate a construction, the English as-predicative, in order to test the predictive power of different kinds of frequency data against that of a recent, more refined corpus-based approach, the so-called collexeme analysis. To that end, the results of the application of these corpus-based approaches to an analysis of the as predicative are compared with the results of a sentence-completion experiment. Concerning the topic under consideration, collexeme analysis is not only shown to be superior on a variety of theoretical and methodological grounds, it also significantly outperforms frequency as a predictor of subjects’ production preferences. We conclude by pointing out some implications for usage-based approaches.

[1]  F. Yates Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the χ2 Test , 1934 .

[2]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[3]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[4]  Dieter Giering English grammar : a university handbook , 1987 .

[5]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[6]  D. Sandra,et al.  Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind—the linguist’s or the language user’s? , 1995 .

[7]  R. Gibbs What's cognitive about cognitive linguistics? , 1996 .

[8]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Fishing for Exactness , 1996, ArXiv.

[9]  Michael Oakes,et al.  Statistics for Corpus Linguistics , 1998 .

[10]  Gisela Redeker,et al.  Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology , 1999 .

[11]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[12]  S. Stoness,et al.  Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , 1999 .

[13]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The emergence of language. , 1999 .

[14]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Book Reviews: Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English , 2000, CL.

[15]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[16]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[17]  Doris Schönefeld Where lexicon and syntax meet , 2001 .

[18]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for the English Language , 2002 .

[19]  D. Noël Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. By SUSAN HUNSTON and GILL FRANCIS (Studies in corpus linguistics 4.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000 , 2002 .

[20]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Probabilistic Syntax , 2002 .

[21]  Hans C. Boas,et al.  A Constructional Approach to Resultatives , 2003 .

[22]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions , 2003 .

[23]  Olga Fischer,et al.  From Sign to Signing , 2003 .

[24]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[25]  Creative syntax: Iconic principles within the symbolic , 2003 .

[26]  The V slot in causative constructions: A collostructional analysis , 2004 .

[27]  Sally Rice,et al.  Patterns of usage for English SIT, STAND, and LIE: A cognitively-inspired exploration in corpus linguistics , 2004 .

[28]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[29]  Michel Achard,et al.  Language, culture and mind , 2004 .

[30]  Kristin Davidse,et al.  Analysing the grammaticalization of edge noun-expressions: a data-driven approach , 2004 .

[31]  Holger Diessel,et al.  The Acquisition of Complex Sentences , 2004 .

[32]  Joybrato Mukherjee Corpus data in a usage-based cognitive grammar , 2004 .

[33]  Stefan Evert,et al.  The Statistics of Word Cooccur-rences: Word Pairs and Collocations , 2004 .

[34]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[35]  R. Fisher Statistical methods for research workers , 1927, Protoplasma.

[36]  S. Gries Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[37]  Stefanie Wulff,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions ? Evidence from priming , sorting , and corpora * , 2005 .