The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems

To explore what social and educational infrastructure is needed to support classroom use of student response systems (Roschelle et al., 2004), this study investigated the ways in which student characteristics and course design choices were related to students’ assessments of the contribution of clicker use to their learning and involvement in the classroom. Survey responses of over 1500 undergraduates enrolled in seven large enrollment ‘clicker courses’ offered by three university departments are analyzed. A number of factors contribute to students’ positive perception of clickers: a desire to be involved and engaged, a view that traditional lecture styles are not best, valuing of feedback, class standing, previous experience with lecture courses, anticipated course performance, and amount of clicker use in the classroom. These results underscore the importance of considering social and communication elements of the classroom when adopting student response technology.

[1]  Adam B. Butler,et al.  Active Learning within a Lecture: Assessing the Impact of Short, In-Class Writing Exercises , 2001 .

[2]  James L. Cooper,et al.  Getting Started: Informal Small-Group Strategies in Large Classes , 2000 .

[3]  Thomas A. Angelo,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. Second Edition. , 1993 .

[4]  A. Roland,et al.  Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. , 1995 .

[5]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[6]  Carolin Kreber,et al.  New Directions for Teaching and Learning , 2007 .

[7]  Keith W. Prichard,et al.  Handbook of college teaching : theory and applications , 1994 .

[8]  Rob Kling,et al.  Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism , 1996 .

[9]  E. Deci,et al.  Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning , 1996 .

[10]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual , 1999 .

[11]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms , 2002 .

[12]  Charles C. Bonwell,et al.  Enhancing the lecture: Revitalizing a traditional format , 1996 .

[13]  K. Smith,et al.  Implementing Small-Group Instruction: Insights from Successful Practitioners , 2000 .

[14]  M. Gleason,et al.  Better Communication in Large Courses , 1986 .

[15]  James L. Cooper,et al.  The argument for making large classes seems small , 2000, New Directions for Teaching and Learning.

[16]  Caroline Elliott,et al.  Using a personal response system in economics teaching , 2003 .

[17]  Frank Costin,et al.  Lecturing versus Other Methods of Teaching: A Review of Research , 1972 .

[18]  Quintin Cutts,et al.  Electronically enhanced classroom interaction , 2002 .

[19]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[20]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Nancy E. Perry,et al.  Investigating Teacher-Student Interactions That Foster Self-Regulated Learning , 2002 .

[22]  Robert D. Abbott,et al.  Students' perceptions of large classes , 1987 .

[23]  Jean MacGregor,et al.  Collaborative learning: Shared inquiry as a process of reform , 1990 .

[24]  Christopher Knapper.  Large classes and learning , 1987 .

[25]  Klara K. Papp,et al.  The answer to stimulating lectures is the question , 1996 .

[26]  Dietrich Ober,et al.  A Student Response System in an Electronic Classroom: Technology Aids for Large Classroom Instruction , 1997 .

[27]  Joel Geske,et al.  Overcoming the Drawbacks of the Large Lecture Class , 1992 .

[28]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[29]  John McLeish,et al.  The Lecture Method. , 1968 .

[30]  GB Heath.  Lecturing , 1971, Veterinary Record.

[31]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[32]  David Nicol,et al.  Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers , 1994 .

[33]  Colleen Garside,et al.  Look who's talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills , 1996 .

[34]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. , 1992 .

[35]  Karl C. Mamola.  Additional information for contributors , 2001 .

[36]  Bette LaSere Erickson,et al.  Teaching College Freshmen , 1991 .

[37]  R. Burnstein,et al.  Using Wireless Keypads in Lecture Classes , 2001 .

[38]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[39]  A. Astin.  What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[40]  P. Pintrich.  A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[41]  T. M. Sutherland,et al.  Lecture Method , 2020 .