Wearable shoe-based device for rehabilitation of stroke patients

Regaining the ability to walk after a stroke is a major rehabilitation goal. Rehabilitation strategies that are task oriented and intensive can drive cortical reorganization and increase activity levels in people after a stroke. This paper describes a novel, wearable device for use with such rehabilitation strategies. The device is based on the combination of a smartphone and in-shoe sensors, and is designed to operate in free living conditions. Data collected from the device can be used for automatic recognition of postures and activities, characterization of extremity use and to provide behavioral enhancing feedback to patients recovering from a stroke. The proposed wearable platform's operation was validated in a small scale study involving three healthy individuals. The average accuracy of classification of three postures and activities was over 99%. Based on the results of validation and previously reported results on recognition of postures and activities in stroke patients, it is anticipated that recognition of postures and activities may be performed with high accuracy in free living conditions.

[1]  Kay Römer,et al.  Practical time synchronization for Bluetooth Scatternets , 2007, 2007 Fourth International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems (BROADNETS '07).

[2]  Edward Sazonov,et al.  Monitoring of Posture Allocations and Activities by a Shoe-Based Wearable Sensor , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[4]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. , 2006, Europa medicophysica.

[5]  T. Olsen,et al.  Stroke. Neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1999, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[6]  C. Richards,et al.  Gait in stroke: assessment and rehabilitation. , 1999, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[7]  E. Taub,et al.  The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. , 2006, Europa medicophysica.

[8]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[9]  R. Macko,et al.  Cardiovascular Health and Fitness After Stroke , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[10]  Edward Sazonov,et al.  Wireless Intelligent Sensor and Actuator Network - A Scalable Platform for Time-synchronous Applications of Structural Health Monitoring , 2010 .

[11]  E. Taub,et al.  Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy to treatment outcome. , 2006, NeuroRehabilitation.

[12]  Edward Sazonov,et al.  Using Sensors to Measure Activity in People with Stroke , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[13]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Emily Fox,et al.  Effects of Stroke Severity and Training Duration on Locomotor Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[16]  Stephanie Schuckers,et al.  Automatic Recognition of postures and activities in stroke patients , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.