Inferences in dichotomous classifications with misclassifications based on sequential repetitive classifications

ABSTRACT To create inferences in dichotomous classifications with misclassifications and possibly perform repeated classifications, the maximum likelihood method is commonly used, mainly because of its efficiency in obtaining parameter estimators of a mixture of two binomial distributions. One simpler alternative that is operationally easier is to consider the simple majority method. In this method, each of n items are classified r times as conforming or non-conforming. The final classification of the item is determined by the most frequent class. This method yielded lower mean squared errors than the maximum likelihood and the moments estimators and is asymptotically efficient. In this paper, we introduce a new approach in which the realization of all r repeated classifications of each item may not be needed. Each of n items is sequentially classified as conforming or nonconforming, and the process ceases when the frequency of conforming or non-conforming classification reaches the integer a. We show that, by a Monte Carlo simulation, the last procedure presents a lower mean squared error than the simple majority results for a similar number of r repeated classifications.

[1]  Frank C. Kaminsky,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INSPECTOR ERRORS ON THE TRUE FRACTION NON-CONFORMING: AN INDUSTRIAL EXPERIMENT , 1995 .

[2]  D. Darling,et al.  A Test of Goodness of Fit , 1954 .

[3]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Estimation by moments in a model of faulty inspection , 1986 .

[4]  Stefan H. Steiner,et al.  Assessment of a Binary Measurement System in Current Use , 2010 .

[5]  Stefan H. Steiner,et al.  Assessing a Binary Measurement System With Varying Misclassification Rates When a Gold Standard Is Available , 2013, Technometrics.

[6]  H. Fujisawa,et al.  Inference about Misclassification Probabilities from Repeated Binary Responses , 2000, Biometrics.

[7]  Soren Bisgaard,et al.  2k–p Experiments with Binary Responses: Inverse Binomial Sampling , 2000 .

[8]  Stefan H. Steiner,et al.  Assessing a Binary Measurement System , 2008 .

[9]  Stefan H. Steiner,et al.  Assessing a Binary Measurement System with Varying Misclassification Rates Using a Latent Class Random Effects Model , 2012 .

[10]  Betsy S. Greenberg,et al.  Repetitive testing in the presence of inspection errors , 1995 .

[11]  Jeroen de Mast,et al.  Measurement System Analysis for Binary Data , 2008, Technometrics.

[12]  W. Blischke Estimating the Parameters of Mixtures of Binomial Distributions , 1964 .

[13]  W. Blischke Moment Estimators for the Parameters of a Mixture of Two Binomial Distributions , 1960 .

[14]  P. Levy Measurement Error and Misclassification in Statistics and Epidemiology: Impacts and Bayesian Adjustments , 2004 .

[15]  Roberto da Costa Quinino,et al.  Alternative estimator for the parameters of a mixture of two binomial distributions , 2013 .

[16]  Roger M. Sauter,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[17]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Estimation from binomial data with classifiers of known and unknown imperfections , 1988 .

[18]  Bruce G. Lindsay,et al.  Errors in Inspection: Integer Parameter Maximum Likelihood in a Finite Population , 1985 .

[19]  Richard R. Carlson Inspection Errors for Attributes in Quality Control , 1993 .

[20]  Michael Evans,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Binary Data Subject to Misclassification , 1996 .