Social Conventions and Issues of Space for Distributed Collaboration

We followed the work of an international research network that holds regular meetings in technology-enhanced environments. The team is geographically distributed and to support its collaborative work it uses a set of technical artifacts, including audio- and videoconferencing systems and a media space. We have been studying some of the techniques and social conventions the team develops for its collaboration, and different aspects of what it mean to be located in a shared but distributed workspace. Our approach has been to analyze the initiatives and responses made by the team members. Over time the group created conventions; e.g. the chair introduces team members participating only by audio and members turn off their microphones when not talking. The latter convention led to the side effect of faster decision making. We also identified two characteristics, implicit excluding and explicit including, in a situation where the majority of the team members were co-located.

[1]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Rainbow: A framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[2]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Designing dynamic interactive visualisations to support collaboration and cognition , 2002, Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[3]  David Lewis Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[4]  Per Linell,et al.  Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis , 1988 .

[5]  Per Linell,et al.  Episodes: coding and analyzing coherence in multiparty conversation , 1996 .

[6]  Lynn Wilcox,et al.  Shared interactive video for teleconferencing , 2003, MULTIMEDIA '03.

[7]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[8]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[9]  Steven E. Poltrock,et al.  A team collaboration space supporting capture and access of virtual meetings , 2001, GROUP.

[10]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[11]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  One is not enough: multiple views in a media space , 1993, INTERCHI.

[12]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Social Conventions in Collaborative Virtual Environments , 1998 .

[13]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[14]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Thunderwire: a field study of an audio-only media space , 1996, CSCW '96.

[15]  Norbert A. Streitz Cooperative buildings—integrating information, organization and architecture , 1998, CSCW '98.

[16]  Robert Ramberg,et al.  Backdoor Creativity: Collaborative Creativity in Technology Supported Teams , 2004, COOP.

[17]  Nicole Yankelovich,et al.  Meeting central: making distributed meetings more effective , 2004, CSCW.

[18]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Designing for change in networked learning environments : proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 , 2003 .

[19]  Carla Simone,et al.  Cooperative Systems Design, Scenario-Based Design of Collaborative Systems [Proceedings of COOP 2004, Hyères Les Palmiers, France, May 11-14, 2004] , 2004, COOP.

[20]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Action as language in a shared visual space , 2004, CSCW.

[21]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception , 2002, CSCW '02.

[22]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Video helps remote work: speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other , 1999, CHI '99.

[23]  N. Sadat Shami,et al.  In-group/out-group effects in distributed teams: an experimental simulation , 2004, CSCW.

[24]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[25]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: models and frameworks , 2004, CSCW.

[26]  Saadi Lahlou,et al.  Observing Cognitive Work in Offices , 1999, CoBuild.

[27]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[28]  Ellen Isaacs,et al.  A forum for supporting interactive presentations to distributed audiences , 1994, CSCW '94.

[29]  Young ae Hahn,et al.  Activity Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems , 2005 .

[30]  N. Sadat Shami,et al.  Collocation blindness in partially distributed groups: is there a downside to being collocated? , 2006, CHI.

[31]  Hillevi Sundholm,et al.  To Share or Not to Share - Distributed Collaboration in Interactive Workspaces , 2006, COOP.

[32]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Conversation analysis: an approach to the study of social action as sense making practices , 1997 .

[33]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[34]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[35]  John C. Tang,et al.  What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study , 2005, Multimedia Systems.

[36]  Duska Rosenberg,et al.  Interaction space theory: a framework for tool development , 2003, ISICT.

[37]  Robert Ramberg,et al.  Learning Conceptual Design : Activities with Electronic Whiteboards , 2004 .

[38]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[39]  Helene Hembrooke,et al.  Activity-Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems , 2004 .

[40]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work , 2001 .

[41]  T. V. Dijk Discourse as Social Interaction , 1997 .

[42]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[43]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[44]  M. Abel Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization , 1990 .

[45]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Group-to-Group Distance Collaboration: Examining the "Space Between" , 2003, ECSCW.

[46]  Carla Simone,et al.  A notation for malleable and interoperable coordination mechanisms for CSCW systems , 1995, COCS '95.

[47]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in the Space of Debate , 2003, CSCL.

[48]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .