Ontology for observations and sampling features, with alignments to existing models

We introduce new OWL ontologies for observations and sampling features, based on the O&M conceptual model from OGC and ISO 19156. Previous efforts, (a) through the W3C SSN project, and (b) following ISO rules for conversion from UML, had dependencies on elaborate pre-existing ontologies and frameworks. The new ontologies, known as om-lite and sam- lite, remove such dependencies, and can therefore be used with minimal ontological commitment beyond the O&M conceptual model. Time and space concepts, for which there are multiple existing solutions, are implemented as stub-classes, and patterns for linking to the existing ontologies are described. PROV is used to support certain requirements for the description of specimens. A more general alignment of both observation and sampling feature ontologies with PROV is described, as well as mappings to some other observation models and ontologies.

[1]  John A. Kunze,et al.  The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set , 2007, RFC.

[2]  Kerstin Kleese van Dam,et al.  Data integration with the Climate Science Modelling Language , 2006 .

[3]  Simon Cox,et al.  Time Ontology in OWL , 2017 .

[4]  Kerry L. Taylor,et al.  Sensor Data Provenance: SSNO and PROV-O Together At Last , 2014, TC/SSN@ISWC.

[5]  Simon J. D. Cox,et al.  Time ontology extended for non-Gregorian calendar applications , 2016, Semantic Web.

[6]  M. Petró‐Turza,et al.  The International Organization for Standardization. , 2003 .

[7]  Viviana Mascardi,et al.  A Comparison of Upper Ontologies , 2007, WOA.

[8]  Christoph Stasch,et al.  A Stimulus-Centric Algebraic Approach to Sensors and Observations , 2009, GSN.

[9]  Bernardo Cuenca Grau,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Profiles , 2009 .

[10]  Barry Smith,et al.  Semantics in Support of Biodiversity Knowledge Discovery: An Introduction to the Biological Collections Ontology and Related Ontologies , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  S. J. Cox,et al.  Observations to information , 2013 .

[12]  C. Michael Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  World Wide Web Consortium , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[13]  Jeffery S. Horsburgh,et al.  Extending the Interoperability of Sensor and Sample Based Earth Observations using a Community Information Model (Invited) , 2013 .

[14]  Markus Lupp.  Open Geospatial Consortium , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[15]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  The Stimulus-Sensor-Observation Ontology Design Pattern and its Integration into the Semantic Sensor Network Ontology , 2010, SSN.

[16]  Simon Cox,et al.  An explicit OWL representation of ISO/OGC Observations and Measurements , 2013, SSN@ISWC.

[17]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[18]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  PROV-O: The PROV Ontology , 2013 .

[19]  Andreas Harth,et al.  SAOR: Authoritative Reasoning for the Web , 2008, ASWC.

[20]  Andreas Harth,et al.  Weaving the Pedantic Web , 2010, LDOW.

[21]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (Second Edition) , 2012 .

[22]  Stephen J. Cox,et al.  Using the Assay Data Exchange standard with WFS to build a complete minerals exploration data-transfer chain , 2005 .

[23]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  An ontology for describing and synthesizing ecological observation data , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[24]  Martin Fowler,et al.  Analysis patterns - reusable object models , 1996, Addison-Wesley series in object-oriented software engineering.