Grand average ERP-image plotting and statistics: A method for comparing variability in event-related single-trial EEG activities across subjects and conditions

BACKGROUD With the advent of modern computing methods, modeling trial-to-trial variability in biophysical recordings including electroencephalography (EEG) has become of increasingly interest. Yet no widely used method exists for comparing variability in ordered collections of single-trial data epochs across conditions and subjects. NEW METHOD We have developed a method based on an ERP-image visualization tool in which potential, spectral power, or some other measure at each time point in a set of event-related single-trial data epochs are represented as color coded horizontal lines that are then stacked to form a 2-D colored image. Moving-window smoothing across trial epochs can make otherwise hidden event-related features in the data more perceptible. Stacking trials in different orders, for example ordered by subject reaction time, by context-related information such as inter-stimulus interval, or some other characteristic of the data (e.g., latency-window mean power or phase of some EEG source) can reveal aspects of the multifold complexities of trial-to-trial EEG data variability. RESULTS This study demonstrates new methods for computing and visualizing 'grand' ERP-image plots across subjects and for performing robust statistical testing on the resulting images. These methods have been implemented and made freely available in the EEGLAB signal-processing environment that we maintain and distribute.

[1]  S. Makeig,et al.  Section: Behavioral/systems/cognitive Medial Prefrontal Theta Bursts Precede Rapid Motor Responses during Visual Selective Attention Introduction , 2022 .

[2]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[3]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[4]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[6]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[7]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Analysis and visualization of single‐trial event‐related potentials , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[8]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New Tools for Advanced EEG Processing , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[12]  R. Perneta,et al.  Cluster-based computational methods for mass univariate analyses of event-related brain potentials/fields: A simulation study , 2014 .

[13]  Scott Makeig,et al.  High-frequency Broadband Modulations of Electroencephalographic Spectra , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  Comparison of averaging and regression techniques for estimating Event Related Potentials , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  J. Wayne Aldridge,et al.  A quantitative method of computer analysis of spike train data collected from behaving animals , 1979, Brain Research.

[17]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Electroencephalographic Brain Dynamics Following Manually Responded Visual Targets , 2004, PLoS biology.