Comparison of plant diversity-carbon storage relationships along altitudinal gradients in temperate forests and shrublands

Understanding the mechanisms underlying the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function (BEF) is critical for the implementation of productive and resilient ecosystem management. However, the differences in BEF relationships along altitudinal gradients between forests and shrublands are poorly understood, impeding the ability to manage terrestrial ecosystems and promote their carbon sinks. Using data from 37962 trees of 115 temperate forest and 134 shrubland plots of Taihang Mountains Priority Reserve, we analyzed the effects of species diversity, structural diversity, climate factors and soil moisture on carbon storage along altitudinal gradients in temperate forests and shrublands. We found that: (1) Structural diversity, rather than species diversity, mainly promoted carbon storage in forests. While species diversity had greater positive effect on carbon storage in shrublands. (2) Mean annual temperature (MAT) had a direct negative effect on forest carbon storage, and indirectly affected forest carbon storage by inhibiting structural diversity. In contrast, MAT promoted shrubland carbon storage directly and indirectly through the positive mediating effect of species diversity. (3) Increasing altitudinal gradients enhanced the structural diversity-carbon relationship in forests, but weakened the species diversity-carbon relationship in shrublands. Niche and architectural complementarity and different life strategies of forests and shrubs mainly explain these findings. These differential characteristics are critical for our comprehensive understanding of the BEF relationship and could help guide the differentiated management of forests and shrublands in reaction to environmental changes.

[1]  Arshad Ali.  Editorial: Plant diversity and biomass dynamics under environmental variation , 2023, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[2]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Biological, structural and functional responses of tropical forests to environmental factors , 2022, Biological Conservation.

[3]  K. Ma,et al.  Climate and mycorrhizae mediate the relationship of tree species diversity and carbon stocks in subtropical forests , 2022 .

[4]  Qianmei Zhang,et al.  Tree Diversity, Structure and Functional Trait Identity Promote Stand Biomass Along Elevational Gradients in Subtropical Forests of Southern China , 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[5]  Xinxiao Yu,et al.  Adaptability of tree water use to elevation changes: a case study of a mixed forest in Northern China , 2022, Journal of Hydrology.

[6]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Phylotype diversity within soil fungal functional groups drives ecosystem stability , 2022, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[7]  Hua Zheng,et al.  Tropical forest strata shifts in plant structural diversity-aboveground carbon relationships along altitudinal gradients. , 2022, Science of the Total Environment.

[8]  Jinfeng Chang,et al.  Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality , 2022, Science China Life Sciences.

[9]  T. Crowther,et al.  Past climate conditions predict the influence of nitrogen enrichment on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration , 2021, Communications Earth & Environment.

[10]  T. Eid,et al.  Species diversity and stand structural diversity of woody plants predominantly determine aboveground carbon stock of a dry Afromontane forest in Northern Ethiopia , 2021 .

[11]  A. Salehi,et al.  Tree-size dimension inequality shapes aboveground carbon stock across temperate forest strata along environmental gradients , 2021 .

[12]  D. Donato,et al.  Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage , 2021, Nature Communications.

[13]  D. Deane,et al.  Direct effects of selection on aboveground biomass contrast with indirect structure-mediated effects of complementarity in a subtropical forest , 2021, Oecologia.

[14]  F. Ullah,et al.  Stand structure determines aboveground biomass across temperate forest types and species mixture along a local-scale elevational gradient , 2021 .

[15]  Le Wang,et al.  Vegetation diversity and mapping in the priority area of Taihang Mountains biodiversity conservation (Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region) , 2021 .

[16]  Haftu Abrha,et al.  Structural diversity consistently mediates species richness effects on aboveground carbon along altitudinal gradients in northern Ethiopian grazing exclosures. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Ren-qing Wang,et al.  Biodiversity, environmental context and structural attributes as drivers of aboveground biomass in shrublands at the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River basin. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  F. Bongers,et al.  Forest structure drives changes in light heterogeneity during tropical secondary forest succession , 2020, The Journal of ecology.

[19]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration , 2020, Nature.

[20]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2020 , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[21]  Li-bin Liu,et al.  Traits of shrubs in forests and bushes reveal different life strategies , 2020 .

[22]  M. Tanase,et al.  Structural diversity underpins carbon storage in Australian temperate forests , 2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[23]  C. Nock,et al.  Drivers of productivity and its temporal stability in a tropical tree diversity experiment , 2019, Global change biology.

[24]  Arshad Ali.  Forest stand structure and functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[25]  Wenhong Ma,et al.  Increasing water availability and facilitation weaken biodiversity–biomass relationships in shrublands , 2019, Ecology.

[26]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Climate and soils determine aboveground biomass indirectly via species diversity and stand structural complexity in tropical forests , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[27]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Climatic water availability is the main limiting factor of biotic attributes across large-scale elevational gradients in tropical forests. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Large influence of soil moisture on long-term terrestrial carbon uptake , 2018, Nature.

[29]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment , 2018, Science.

[30]  P. Reich,et al.  Effects of climate warming on photosynthesis in boreal tree species depend on soil moisture , 2018, Nature.

[31]  M. Loreau,et al.  Aboveground carbon storage is driven by functional trait composition and stand structural attributes rather than biodiversity in temperate mixed forests recovering from disturbances , 2018, Annals of Forest Science.

[32]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Biomass Stock and Productivity of Primeval and Production Beech Forests: Greater Canopy Structural Diversity Promotes Productivity , 2018, Ecosystems.

[33]  T. Seifert,et al.  Diversity–biomass relationship across forest layers: implications for niche complementarity and selection effects , 2018, Oecologia.

[34]  F. Chapin,et al.  Plant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Topography shapes the structure, composition and function of tropical forest landscapes , 2018, Ecology letters.

[36]  C. Gough,et al.  Forest Canopy Structural Complexity and Light Absorption Relationships at the Subcontinental Scale , 2018 .

[37]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Forest structure in space and time: Biotic and abiotic determinants of canopy complexity and their effects on net primary productivity , 2018 .

[38]  E. Vivoni,et al.  Shrubland carbon sink depends upon winter water availability in the warm deserts of North America , 2018 .

[39]  Marielos Peña-Claros,et al.  Soil fertility and species traits, but not diversity, drive productivity and biomass stocks in a Guyanese tropical rainforest , 2018 .

[40]  C. Nock,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[41]  Arshad Ali,et al.  The forest strata-dependent relationship between biodiversity and aboveground biomass within a subtropical forest , 2017 .

[42]  Christian Messier,et al.  Spatial complementarity in tree crowns explains overyielding in species mixtures , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[43]  Anthony R. Taylor,et al.  Positive species diversity and above‐ground biomass relationships are ubiquitous across forest strata despite interference from overstorey trees , 2017 .

[44]  Filippo Bussotti,et al.  Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests , 2016, Science.

[45]  Xiao-Dong Yang,et al.  Stand structural diversity rather than species diversity enhancesaboveground carbon storage in secondary subtropical forests in Eastern China , 2016 .

[46]  R. Corlett.  The Impacts of Droughts in Tropical Forests. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[47]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Structural diversity promotes productivity of mixed, uneven-aged forests in southwestern Germany , 2016, Oecologia.

[48]  U. Goodale,et al.  Effect of topography and litterfall input on fine-scale patch consistency of soil chemical properties in a tropical rainforest , 2016, Plant and Soil.

[49]  J. Bauhus,et al.  A Review of Processes Behind Diversity—Productivity Relationships in Forests , 2016, Current Forestry Reports.

[50]  J. Chave,et al.  Does climate directly influence NPP globally? , 2016, Global change biology.

[51]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests , 2015 .

[52]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Individual size inequality links forest diversity and above‐ground biomass , 2015 .

[53]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Complementarity and selection effects in early and mid‐successional plant communities are differentially affected by plant–soil feedback , 2015 .

[54]  Jürgen Homeier,et al.  Is tropical montane forest heterogeneity promoted by a resource-driven feedback cycle? Evidence from nutrient relations, herbivory and litter decomposition along a topographical gradient , 2015 .

[55]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Corrigendum to "The relationship between tree biodiversity and biomass dynamics changes with tropical forest succession" , 2014 .

[56]  M. Loreau,et al.  Tropical tree diversity enhances light capture through crown plasticity and spatial and temporal niche differences , 2014 .

[57]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Spatial patterns of above-ground structure, biomass and composition in a network of six Andean elevation transects , 2014 .

[58]  D. Forrester.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: From pattern to process , 2014 .

[59]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[60]  He Jinsheng,et al.  Methods and protocols for plant community inventory. , 2009 .

[61]  B. Wilsey,et al.  Do species evenness and plant density influence the magnitude of selection and complementarity effects in annual plant species mixtures , 2003 .

[62]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[63]  D. Tilman.  THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[64]  Ye Zhang,et al.  A 1 km daily soil moisture dataset over China using in situ measurement and machine learning , 2022 .

[65]  Shan-shan Tan,et al.  Scale dependent effects of species diversity and structural diversity on aboveground biomass in a tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama , 2017 .

[66]  M. Loreau,et al.  Does complementary resource use enhance ecosystem functioning? A model of light competition in plant communities. , 2007, Ecology letters.