IDENTIFICATION OF NEW ORBITS TO ENABLE FUTURE MISSION OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE HUMAN EXPLORATION OF THE MARTIAN MOON PHOBOS

Abstract One of the paramount stepping stones towards NASA׳s long-term goal of undertaking human missions to Mars is the exploration of the Martian moons. Since a precursor mission to Phobos would be easier than landing on Mars itself, NASA is targeting this moon for future exploration, and ESA has also announced Phootprint as a candidate Phobos sample-and-return mission. Orbital dynamics around small planetary satellites are particularly complex because many strong perturbations are involved, and the classical circular restricted three-body problem (R3BP) does not provide an accurate approximation to describe the system׳s dynamics. Phobos is a special case, since the combination of a small mass-ratio and length-scale means that the sphere-of-influence of the moon moves very close to its surface. Thus, an accurate nonlinear model of a spacecraft׳s motion in the vicinity of this moon must consider the additional perturbations due to the orbital eccentricity and the complete gravity field of Phobos, which is far from a spherical-shaped body, and it is incorporated into an elliptic R3BP using the gravity harmonics series-expansion (ER3BP-GH). In this paper, a showcase of various classes of non-keplerian orbits is identified and a number of potential mission applications in the Mars–Phobos system are proposed: these results could be exploited in upcoming unmanned missions targeting the exploration of this Martian moon. These applications include: low-thrust hovering and orbits around Phobos for close-range observations; the dynamical substitutes of periodic and quasi-periodic Libration Point Orbits in the ER3BP-GH to enable unique low-cost operations for space missions in the proximity of Phobos; their manifold structure for high-performance landing/take-off maneuvers to and from Phobos’ surface and for transfers from and to Martian orbits; Quasi-Satellite Orbits for long-period station-keeping and maintenance. In particular, these orbits could exploit Phobos’ occulting bulk and shadowing wake as a passive radiation shield during future manned flights to Mars to reduce human exposure to radiation, and the latter orbits can be used as an orbital garage, requiring no orbital maintenance, where a spacecraft could make planned pit-stops during a round-trip mission to Mars.

[1]  P. Rosenblatt The origin of the Martian moons revisited , 2011 .

[2]  J. Marsden,et al.  Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem and Space Mission Design , 2009 .

[3]  D. Tholen,et al.  Report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on cartographic coordinates and rotational elements: 2006 , 2007 .

[4]  Kenneth Seidelmann Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements , 2007 .

[5]  S. Mikkola,et al.  Stability limits for the quasi-satellite orbit , 2006 .

[6]  F. Cabral On the Stability of Quasi-Satellite Orbits in the Elliptic Restricted Three-Body Problem , 2011 .

[7]  Paulo Gil,et al.  Simulations of Quasi-Satellite Orbits Around Phobos , 2010 .

[8]  Gregory J. Whiffen,et al.  Exploration of distant retrograde orbits around Europa , 2005 .

[9]  J. Peláez,et al.  On the stability of artificial equilibrium points in the circular restricted three-body problem , 2011 .

[10]  Mattia Zamaro,et al.  Dynamical systems techniques for designing libration point orbits in proximity of highly-inhomogeneous planetary satellites: Application to the Mars-Phobos elliptic three-body problem with additional gravity harmonics , 2014 .

[11]  Mattia Zamaro,et al.  Natural motion around the Martian moon Phobos: the dynamical substitutes of the Libration Point Orbits in an elliptic three-body problem with gravity harmonics , 2015 .

[12]  Michel Henon,et al.  Numerical exploration of the restricted problem. V. Hill's case: Periodic orbits and their stability. , 1969 .

[13]  Yoshihide Kozai,et al.  The motion of a close earth satellite , 1959 .

[14]  Lockheed Martin,et al.  Comparison of Deimos and Phobos as Destinations for Human Exploration and Identification of Preferred Landing Sites , 2011 .

[15]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Survey of Highly Non-Keplerian Orbits with Low-Thrust Propulsion , 2011 .

[16]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[17]  T. Duxbury,et al.  Pole and prime meridian expressions for Phobos and Deimos , 1981 .

[18]  C. Pei Solar energetic particle transport in the heliosphere , 2007 .

[19]  G. Gómez,et al.  The dynamics around the collinear equilibrium points of the RTBP , 2001 .

[20]  Nathan J. Strange,et al.  Orbital Operations for Phobos and Deimos Exploration , 2012 .

[21]  G. Reitz,et al.  Overview of energetic particle hazards during prospective manned missions to Mars , 2012 .

[22]  N. Crosby,et al.  MarsREM : The Mars Energetic Radiation Environment Models , 2009 .

[23]  Michel Henon,et al.  Numerical exploration of the restricted problem. VI. Hill's case: Non-periodic orbits. , 1970 .

[24]  T. Morrison,et al.  Dynamical Systems , 2021, Nature.

[25]  B. Fong Chao,et al.  The gravitational field of Phobos , 1989 .

[26]  G. Reitz Biological Effects of Space Radiation , 1998 .

[27]  R. Battin An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .