DFM-aware fault model and ATPG for intra-cell and inter-cell defects

Yield improvement, yield ramp, and defect screening have been major areas of concern for the semiconductor industry as technology nodes have advanced. Much effort has been focused on capturing the defects missed by traditional stuck-at and transition delay fault model based testing. A majority of these un-modeled defects stems from features inside a standard cell or between two adjacent standard cells. Traditionally, critical area has been used as the manufacturability guideline to determine opens and shorts that should be targeted for test. This paper motivates a new paradigm — a design-for-manufacturability (DFM) hotspot-aware fault model to target intra-cell and inter-cell defects. The basic objective behind this approach is to bring in knowledge of manufacturing vulnerability in design layouts to weigh likelihood of occurrence of systematic defects. Recent technologies have standard cells much smaller than the lithography-driven optical diameter which means the cell's feature context is a key driver for DFM-driven fault sensitivity. This paper describes a novel automated flow for cell characterization that can be used to create patterns at the cell boundary for DFM-aware faults. The paper presents ATPG results for different DFM-aware faults, and analyzes the coverage gaps. Finally, the paper ends with a comparison with the cell-aware and dual-cell-aware fault models, and describes relative advantages and application scenarios.

[1]  Massimo Alioto,et al.  Analysis of layout density in FinFET standard cells and impact of fin technology , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[2]  Jürgen Koehl,et al.  DATE 2006 Special Session: DFM/DFY Design for Manufacturability and Yield - influence of process variations in digital, analog and mixed-signal circuit design , 2006, Proceedings of the Design Automation & Test in Europe Conference.

[3]  Massimo Alioto Analysis and evaluation of layout density of FinFET logic gates , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Microelectronics - ICM.

[4]  Rajesh Raina What is DFM & DFY and Why Should I Care ? , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Test Conference.

[5]  Ying-Yen Chen,et al.  Methodology of generating dual-cell-aware tests , 2017, 2017 IEEE 35th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS).

[6]  John Paul Shen,et al.  Extraction and simulation of realistic CMOS faults using inductive fault analysis , 1988, International Test Conference 1988 Proceeding@m_New Frontiers in Testing.

[7]  T. Herrmann,et al.  Identifying systematic critical features using silicon diagnosis data , 2012, 2012 SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference.

[8]  John H. Bruning Optical lithography: 40 years and holding , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  John P. Hayes,et al.  The input pattern fault model and its application , 1997, Proceedings European Design and Test Conference. ED & TC 97.

[10]  Sandip Kundu,et al.  Lithography aware critical area estimation and yield analysis , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Test Conference.

[11]  John Paul Shen,et al.  Inductive Fault Analysis of MOS Integrated Circuits , 1985, IEEE Design & Test of Computers.

[12]  Irith Pomeranz,et al.  Testing for systematic defects based on DFM guidelines , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Test Conference.

[13]  Friedrich Hapke,et al.  Cell-Aware Test , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[14]  R. D. Blanton,et al.  To DFM or not to DFM? , 2011, 2011 48th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC).

[15]  Sung Kyu Lim,et al.  Power benefit study for ultra-high density transistor-level monolithic 3D ICs , 2013, 2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC).

[16]  A. Mercha,et al.  Standard cell level parasitics assessment in 20nm BPL and 14nm BFF , 2012, International Electron Devices Meeting.

[17]  Friedrich Hapke,et al.  Cell-aware diagnosis: Defective inmates exposed in their cells , 2016, 2016 21th IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS).

[18]  R. D. Blanton,et al.  Systematic defect identification through layout snippet clustering , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Test Conference.

[19]  Sudhakar M. Reddy,et al.  On generating high quality tests based on cell functions , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC).

[20]  Israel Koren,et al.  Defect tolerance in VLSI circuits: techniques and yield analysis , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[21]  Yu Huang,et al.  Advancements in diagnosis driven yield analysis (DDYA): A survey of state-of-the-art scan diagnosis and yield analysis technologies , 2015, 2015 20th IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS).

[22]  Sriram Madhavan,et al.  Quantified contribution of design for manufacturing to yield at 28nm , 2014, 2014 19th IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS).

[23]  Liu Zeye,et al.  Test chip design for optimal cell-aware diagnosability , 2016 .

[24]  Julie Lee,et al.  Identifying design systematics using learning based diagnostic analysis , 2010, 2010 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC).