Determination of target distance in a structured environment: Selection of visual information for action

In the literature relating to visuo-motor control, controversial data are found concerning the consequence of enriching the visual scene in the specification of the target's spatial coordinates. In this paper four experiments were carried out to unravel this issue. Based on spatio-temporal analysis of pointing movements carried out in an open loop condition, the effect of appending contextual elements in the vicinity of a visual target was investigated, taking into account (1) their location in the visual field, (2) the extent of the movement, and (3) their presence during the planning and/or execution period of the movement. Taken as a whole, results showed that enriching the visual scene gave rise to a decrease of perceptual underestimation of distance (with no effect on the direction parameter), as otherwise observed (dark environment). Though not deeply affecting reaction and movement time, this effect held whatever the target position, provided that the contextual elements were situated between the initial and terminal position of the hand trajectory. The magnitude of the effect was, however, dependent upon the space conferred to the visual context. Furthermore, a higher spatial performance was observed when the latter was provided during the planning of execution period of the movement. Both effects combined when contextual elements were provided during the entire movement, which suggests a continuous updating of target coordinates during the whole motor performance. Altogether these findings underline a dynamic aspect of space perception, originating, in part, in the functional use of contextual cues in the coding of target distance. They also suggest that, provided the visual environment is structured, the retinal signal is widely used in the perception of target distance in visuo-manual tasks.

[1]  Michel Desmurget,et al.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Interactions between Vision for Perception and Vision for Behavior , 2000 .

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Pratt,et al.  Action-centered inhibition: Effects of distractors on movement planning and execution , 1994 .

[5]  J. Cutting,et al.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Y. Coello,et al.  Effect of Size and Frame of Visual Field on the Accuracy of an Aiming Movement , 1997, Perception.

[7]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Tadasu Oyama,et al.  Visual Space Perception , 1962 .

[9]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  W. Shebilske,et al.  Induced esophoric shifts in eye convergence and illusory distance in reduced and structured viewing conditions. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  P Conti,et al.  Role of Structured Visual Field and Visual Reafference in Accuracy of Pointing Movements , 1980, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  John M. Foley,et al.  Error in visually directed manual pointing , 1975 .

[14]  Gordon M. Redding,et al.  Adaptive Spatial Alignment , 1997 .

[15]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Pointing movement in an artificial perturbing inertial field: A prospective paradigm for motor control study , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Visual search and target-directed action , 1999 .

[17]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Subjective sense of hand location in a perturbed pointing task : A test for feedback processing , 1997 .

[18]  P. Viviani,et al.  Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Yann Coello,et al.  Percevoir et agir : I. Influence des contraintes motrices sur la sélection des informations spatiales : Cerveau, perception et action , 2000 .

[20]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Change in perceived spatial directions due to context , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  L. Carlton Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[24]  Steven M. Finbeiner,et al.  The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements , 1989, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[25]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[27]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[28]  F. A. Miles Binocular Vision and Stereopsis by Ian P. Howard and Brian J. Rogers, Oxford University Press, 1995. £90.00 (736 pages) ISBN 0 19 508476 4. , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  W. H. Ittelson Visual space perception , 1961 .

[31]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Some Recent Studies on the Extraretinal Contribution to Distance Perception , 1999, Perception.

[32]  Yann Coello,et al.  The Contribution of Retinal Signal to the Specification of Target Distance in a Visuo-manual Task. , 2000 .

[33]  J J Bloomberg,et al.  The effect of visual context on manual localization of remembered targets , 1997, Neuroreport.

[34]  S. Tipper,et al.  Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects. , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  S. Tipper,et al.  Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects , 1998 .

[36]  D. Pélisson,et al.  From Eye to Hand: Planning Goal-directed Movements , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[37]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[38]  John M. Foley,et al.  Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction, and available cues , 1972 .

[39]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[40]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Complementary Cognitive and Motor Image Processing , 1991 .

[41]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[42]  S. Chieffi,et al.  Visual illusion and action , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.