Demand information acquisition strategy in a dual channel supply chain

This article examines the information acquisition strategy of a dual‐channel supply chain, in which a manufacturer sells a product both through a retailer and through its own direct channel. Either the manufacturer or the retailer can acquire demand information from a third‐party marketing research company. The manufacturer first decides whether or not to acquire such information, and then the retailer decides whether or not to acquire information. This setup implies a signaling game (either the manufacturer or the retailer may have private demand information) with an endogenous information structure. We identify conditions under which neither of the firms will acquire demand information, even when the cost of implementation is negligible. We also show that information acquisition can have a negative impact on the retailer, the supply chain, customers, and society. The manufacturer who acquires information always prefers to share information with the retailer, which benefits the retailer. The retailer who acquires information, however, may not want to share information with the manufacturer. The managerial insight of our paper is that firms that have more accurate demand data must develop strategies for the appropriate use of that information, both in their own planning and within the context of their dual‐channel supply chain.

[1]  H. Pun,et al.  Eliminate demand information disadvantage in a supplier encroachment supply chain with information acquisition , 2022, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  X. Guan,et al.  Acquisition Transparency and Induced Supplier Encroachment , 2021, Omega.

[3]  Xiaohang Yue,et al.  Mobile Consumer Scanning Technology: A Replacement for Interorganizational Information Systems for Demand Information Learning in Supply Chains? , 2021, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Liangfei Qiu,et al.  Multidimensional Observational Learning in Social Networks: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 2021, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Erbao Cao,et al.  Information sharing motivated by production cost reduction in a supply chain with downstream competition , 2021, Naval Research Logistics (NRL).

[6]  Pedro M. Gardete,et al.  Prepurchase Information Acquisition and Credible Advertising , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Liang Guo,et al.  Dual‐Channel Distribution: The Case for Cost Information Asymmetry , 2020, Production and Operations Management.

[8]  Na Liu,et al.  Optimal pricing in on-demand-service-platform-operations with hired agents and risk-sensitive customers in the blockchain era , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Qingning Cao,et al.  Manufacturer encroachment with advertising , 2020 .

[10]  Bintong Chen,et al.  Sourcing Strategy of Original Equipment Manufacturer with Quality Competition , 2019, Decis. Sci..

[11]  X. Guan,et al.  Inducing Supply Chain Transparency Through Supplier Encroachment , 2019 .

[12]  X. Guan,et al.  The Acquisition of Quality Information in a Supply Chain With Voluntary vs. Mandatory Disclosure , 2019, Production and Operations Management.

[13]  Wansheng Tang,et al.  Manufacturer encroachment with production cost reduction under asymmetric information , 2019, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[14]  H. Pun,et al.  Information Liability: A Capacitated Supplier Encroaches on a Less Informed Buyer , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  Xiaohang Yue,et al.  Technology Specifications and Production Timing in a Co‐Opetitive Supply Chain , 2019, Production and Operations Management.

[16]  Xinghao Yan,et al.  Optimal Outsourcing Strategies When Capacity Is Limited , 2018, Decis. Sci..

[17]  Song Huang,et al.  Incentive provision for demand information acquisition in a dual-channel supply chain , 2018, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[18]  Li Jiang,et al.  Impacts of sequential acquisition, market competition mode, and confidentiality on information flow , 2018 .

[19]  Jianwen Luo,et al.  Supplier encroachment under nonlinear pricing with imperfect substitutes: Bargaining power versus revenue-sharing , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  J. Zhang,et al.  Strategic Analysis of Dual Sourcing and Dual Channel with an Unreliable Alternative Supplier , 2015, Production and Operations Management.

[21]  X. Guan,et al.  Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment , 2017 .

[22]  Xu Guan,et al.  The Interplay between Information Acquisition and Quality Disclosure , 2017 .

[23]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[24]  Lin Tian,et al.  To Share or Not to Share: Demand Forecast Sharing in a Distribution Channel , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[25]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Fei Shi,et al.  Endogenous timing, market research, and demand uncertainty , 2015, Oper. Res. Lett..

[27]  Milind G. Sohoni,et al.  Should firms conceal information when dealing with common suppliers? , 2015 .

[28]  Tian Li,et al.  Transparency of Information Acquisition in a Supply Chain , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[29]  Zhuoxin Li,et al.  Supplier Encroachment under Asymmetric Information , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Ying Sun,et al.  Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain , 2012, Omega.

[31]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Supplier Encroachment as an Enhancement or a Hindrance to Nonlinear Pricing , 2012 .

[32]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Purchasing Under Asymmetric Demand and Cost Information: When Is More Private Information Better? , 2011, Oper. Res..

[33]  Liang Guo,et al.  Information Acquisition and Sharing in a Vertical Relationship , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[34]  Liang Guo,et al.  The Benefits of Downstream Information Acquisition , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[35]  Lode Li,et al.  Confidentiality and Information Sharing in Supply Chain Coordination , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[36]  D. Sappington,et al.  The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment , 2007 .

[37]  Samar K. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  A Bertrand model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry , 2006 .

[38]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual - Channel Supply - Chain Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Jennifer F. Reinganum,et al.  Informational Externalities in Settlement Bargaining: Confidentiality and Correlated Culpability , 2002 .

[41]  Kevin R. Gregg,et al.  SLA volume 17 issue 1 Cover and Front matter , 1995, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[42]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria , 1987 .