Crossing power and knowledge boundaries in learning and knowledge sharing: The role of ESM

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the crossing of knowledge and power boundaries within a bureaucratic organization by using enterprise social media (ESM). (Carlile’s 2002) boundary crossing framework is used to guide this research. Design/methodology/approach This is a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews and observations in a large Norwegian public sector organization. Findings The authors find that investigating crossing knowledge and power boundaries by using ESM is problematic at syntactic, semantic and pragmatic levels. ESM is used predominantly for sharing, storing and retrieving explicit knowledge, which is a display of crossing the information-processing boundary. Hence, the possibilities of shifts in formal power positions where all employees can participate on equal terms is not achieved. On the contrary, as shared meaning on how to use EMS, taking the perspective of other on how to share knowledge and thus creating new knowledge practices in EMS by overcoming these knowledge barriers is not evident. Therefore, examples of crossing the semantic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries are rarely found. Research limitations/implications The framework could be applied to a variety of contexts to further explore the role of ESM in learning and knowledge sharing and its ability to cross power and knowledge boundaries. Originality/value This paper addresses a gap in the literature around discussions of power, trust, boundary crossing and the use of ESM for knowledge sharing and learning.

[1]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[2]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[3]  Sotirios Paroutis,et al.  Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Cathrine Filstad,et al.  Learning and knowledge as interrelations between CoPs and NoPs , 2014 .

[5]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Digital Boundary Objects as Negotiation Facilitators: Spanning Boundaries in Virtual Engineering Project Networks , 2013 .

[6]  M. Visser,et al.  Empowerment, knowledge conversion and dimensions of organizational learning , 2011 .

[7]  Thomas Connolly,et al.  The “state of art” of organisational blogging , 2013 .

[8]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[9]  Samuel T. Hunter,et al.  Developing leaders for creative efforts: A domain-based approach to leadership development , 2007 .

[10]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks , 2003 .

[11]  S. Newell,et al.  Managing Knowledge Work and Innovation , 2009 .

[12]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward , 2014 .

[13]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Thomas Connolly,et al.  Implementing Web 2.0 tools in organisations: feasibility of a systematic approach , 2014 .

[15]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Marc H. Goedhart,et al.  What really drives the market , 2005 .

[18]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[19]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[20]  K. Weick,et al.  Learning in Organizations , 2001 .

[21]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[22]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[23]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .