Estimating parametric relationships between health description and health valuation with an application to the EuroQol EQ-5D.

Generic health status measures classify patients into different health states. For example, the EQ-5D descriptive system developed by the EuroQol Group classifies patients into 243 health states. Empirical values for the health states are available for only a selection (mostly 12 to 45) of these health states. Several parametric relationships between the descriptive system and the known values can be formulated to estimate the values for the unrecorded health states. This paper describes several of these modeling exercises in a comprehensible way, using the EQ-5D as an illustration. It is shown that the estimation task does not depend on the meaning of the values, but does depend on the selection of the empirically valued health states and the assumptions about the relationship between these values and the descriptive system.

[1]  A. Williams,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical? , 1992, Journal of medical ethics.

[2]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. , 1994, Social Science & Medicine (1967).

[3]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[4]  P. Dolan.  Modelling valuations for health states , 1997 .

[5]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--I: Measurement strategies. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[7]  George W. Torrance,et al.  APPLICATION OF MULTI-A'ITRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY 'ID MEASURE SOCIAL PREFERENCE'S FOR HEALTH STATES , 1982 .

[8]  Alan Williams,et al.  Is the QALY a Technical Solution to a Political Problem? Of Course Not! , 1991, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[9]  E. van Doorslaer,et al.  Statistical analysis of cost outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trial. , 1994, Health Economics.

[10]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement ☆ , 1981 .

[11]  R. Brooks.  EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.

[12]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Generalizability of valuations on health states collected with the EuroQolc-questionnaire. , 1993, Health economics.

[13]  M. R. Mölken,et al.  Statistical analysis of cost outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trial. , 1994 .

[14]  R M Kaplan,et al.  Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. , 1976, Health services research.

[15]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--III: Population and context effects. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  A. Williams,et al.  Priorities and research strategy in health economics for the 1990s. , 1993, Health economics.

[17]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  R. Carr-Hill,et al.  Allocating Resources to Health Care: Is the QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Year) a Technical Solution to a Political Problem? , 1991, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[19]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Measure Social Preferences for Health States , 1982, Oper. Res..

[20]  G W Torrance,et al.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. , 1995, PharmacoEconomics.

[21]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Identifying and Valuing Outcomes , 1996 .

[22]  A. Williams.  EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[23]  D. Hadorn.  The role of public values in setting health care priorities. , 1991, Social Science & Medicine (1967).

[24]  G. Torrance.  Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. , 1986, Journal of health economics.

[25]  D. Feeny,et al.  Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. , 1996, Medical care.